Kyle Wendt

2.4k citations
29 papers · 1.3k indexed · 3 hit papers · h-index 15

Kyle Wendt

27 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-deca...1992015202620182022100200300

Peers

Kyle Wendt
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.2k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 534
  • Spectroscopy 238
  • Radiation 112
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 151
Replace Alessandro Lovato with:
Alessandro Lovato United States
Bing-Nan Lu China
E. Garrido Spain
Sofia Quaglioni United States
Sonia Bacca Germany
Gautam Rupak United States
Masayuki Matsuzaki Japan
L. E. Marcucci Italy
E. Olsen United States
J. Golak Poland
Kyle Wendt relative to Alessandro Lovato United States Alessandro Lovato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Alessandro Lovato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Wendt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Wendt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Wendt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Wendt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Wendt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Wendt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Wendt. The network helps show where Kyle Wendt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Wendt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Wendt Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Wendt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20244
3 20241
4 20233
5 202310
6 202224
7 202216
8 202025
9
Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principlesbreakdown →
2019199
10 20170
11 201620
12 2016104
13
Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interactionbreakdown →
2015311
14 201443
15 2014132
16 201316
17 20129
18 20114
19 20111
20 19853

About Kyle Wendt

Kyle Wendt is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Radiation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (17 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (9 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (7 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (6 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (3 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (3 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (534 citations), Spectroscopy (238 citations), Radiation (112 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (151 citations). Kyle Wendt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include T. Papenbrock, G. Hagen, A. Ekström, G. R. Jansen, C. Forssén, B. D. Carlsson, M. Hjorth‐Jensen, W. Nazarewicz, Sofia Quaglioni and A. Schwenk. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. C, Physical review. A, Physical Review Letters, Nature Physics and Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026