Kyle McLean

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
35 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Kyle McLean is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kyle McLean has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 27 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Kyle McLean's work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (25 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (20 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (10 papers). Kyle McLean is often cited by papers focused on Policing Practices and Perceptions (25 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (20 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (10 papers). Kyle McLean collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Lithuania. Kyle McLean's co-authors include Geoffrey P. Alpert, Scott E. Wolfe, Roger G. Dunham, Bryan Lee Miller, John M. Stogner, Jeff Rojek, Travis C. Pratt, Michael R. Smith, Justin Nix and Molly McCarthy and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Social Issues, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency.

In The Last Decade

Kyle McLean

34 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Police Stress, Mental Health, and Resiliency during the C... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kyle McLean United States 17 900 870 290 182 163 35 1.3k
Jeff Rojek United States 21 1.2k 1.4× 1.2k 1.3× 392 1.4× 169 0.9× 87 0.5× 47 1.6k
Elise Sargeant Australia 20 1.3k 1.5× 1.0k 1.2× 263 0.9× 166 0.9× 165 1.0× 52 1.5k
Emma Antrobus Australia 15 990 1.1× 889 1.0× 150 0.5× 165 0.9× 149 0.9× 39 1.3k
Kenneth J. Novak United States 19 1.2k 1.3× 856 1.0× 371 1.3× 116 0.6× 98 0.6× 30 1.3k
Natalie Todak United States 20 835 0.9× 933 1.1× 238 0.8× 301 1.7× 94 0.6× 47 1.2k
Allison T. Chappell United States 15 653 0.7× 384 0.4× 162 0.6× 104 0.6× 115 0.7× 26 878
Peter B. Kraska United States 15 927 1.0× 704 0.8× 267 0.9× 183 1.0× 101 0.6× 20 1.2k
Amie M. Schuck United States 22 1.5k 1.6× 1.3k 1.5× 482 1.7× 448 2.5× 380 2.3× 51 2.0k
Brad W. Smith United States 26 1.4k 1.6× 1.2k 1.4× 558 1.9× 192 1.1× 274 1.7× 50 1.9k
Roger G. Dunham United States 24 1.6k 1.8× 1.5k 1.7× 642 2.2× 217 1.2× 151 0.9× 46 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle McLean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle McLean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle McLean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle McLean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle McLean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle McLean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle McLean. The network helps show where Kyle McLean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kyle McLean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kyle McLean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kyle McLean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kyle McLean. Kyle McLean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Boehme, Hunter M., et al.. (2025). Writing at the speed of hype: officers’ post-experimental perceptions of AI report writing. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2 indexed citations
2.
Adams, Ian T., et al.. (2024). No man’s hand: artificial intelligence does not improve police report writing speed. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 22(1). 137–154. 2 indexed citations
4.
Wolfe, Scott E., Kyle McLean, Geoffrey P. Alpert, & Jeff Rojek. (2024). Us Versus Them? The Problem of Cognitive Distortions in Policing. Police Quarterly. 27(4). 532–560. 5 indexed citations
5.
McLean, Kyle, et al.. (2023). Shaping officer behaviour through training and policy. Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice. 17.
6.
McCarthy, Molly, et al.. (2023). The Influence of Guardian and Warrior Police Orientations on Australian Officers’ Use of Force Attitudes and Tactical Decision-Making. Police Quarterly. 27(2). 187–212. 7 indexed citations
7.
McLean, Kyle, et al.. (2023). An experimental look at reasonable suspicion and police discretion. Policing An International Journal. 46(3). 503–520. 1 indexed citations
8.
Adams, Ian T., Scott M. Mourtgos, Kyle McLean, & Geoffrey P. Alpert. (2023). De-fanged. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 20(3). 695–716. 5 indexed citations
9.
McLean, Kyle, et al.. (2022). Re-examining the Use of Force Continuum: Why Resistance is Not the Only Driver of Use of Force Decisions. Police Quarterly. 26(1). 85–110. 14 indexed citations
10.
McLean, Kyle, et al.. (2022). Recruiting for change: shifting focus to address a workforce crisis. Police Practice and Research. 24(4). 446–460. 21 indexed citations
11.
McLean, Kyle & Justin Nix. (2021). Understanding the Bounds of Legitimacy: Weber’s Facets of Legitimacy and the Police Empowerment Hypothesis. Justice Quarterly. 39(6). 1287–1309. 25 indexed citations
12.
Alpert, Geoffrey P. & Kyle McLean. (2021). The more things change, the more they stay the same: the Queensland Police Service as a model for sustainable policing reform. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. 45(3). 345–355. 5 indexed citations
13.
McLean, Kyle, Scott E. Wolfe, Jeff Rojek, Geoffrey P. Alpert, & Michael R. Smith. (2020). Randomized controlled trial of social interaction police training. Criminology & Public Policy. 19(3). 805–832. 54 indexed citations
14.
Stogner, John M., Bryan Lee Miller, & Kyle McLean. (2020). Police Stress, Mental Health, and Resiliency during the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Criminal Justice. 45(4). 718–730. 197 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
McLean, Kyle. (2019). Revisiting the role of distributive justice in Tyler’s legitimacy theory. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 16(2). 335–346. 32 indexed citations
16.
Alpert, Geoffrey P., Kyle McLean, & Scott E. Wolfe. (2017). Consent Decrees. Police Quarterly. 20(3). 239–249. 16 indexed citations
17.
McLean, Kyle & Scott E. Wolfe. (2015). A Sense of Injustice Loosens the Moral Bind of Law. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 43(1). 27–44. 32 indexed citations
18.
McLean, Kyle. (2015). Ethnic Identity, Procedural Justice, and Offending: Does Procedural Justice Work the Same for Everyone?. Crime & Delinquency. 63(10). 1314–1336. 14 indexed citations
19.
Fox, Paul, et al.. (2015). Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors’ Views of Teacher–Student Sexual Contact. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 33(9). 1449–1471. 7 indexed citations
20.
McLean, Kyle, Geoffrey P. Alpert, & Roger G. Dunham. (1993). Critical Issues in Policing: Contemporary Readings. 381 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026