Kyle A. Thomas
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation 4
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 2
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 1
- Co-authors
- Scott Clifford (1 shared paper)Peter DeScioli (5 shared papers)Steven Pinker (5 shared papers)Omar Sultan Haque (2 shared papers)Julian De Freitas (3 shared papers)Liane Young (1 shared paper)Malte Persike (1 shared paper)Bruce Bridgeman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2 papers)Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1 paper)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)Perception (1 paper)Cognitive Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Kyle A. Thomas
8 papers receiving 652 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Safety Research 101
- Applied Psychology 58
- General Decision Sciences 15
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 103
- Social Psychology 150
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle A. Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle A. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle A. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle A. Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle A. Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle A. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle A. Thomas. The network helps show where Kyle A. Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Kyle A. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 463 |
| 2 | 2014 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 1 |
About Kyle A. Thomas
Kyle A. Thomas is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Social Psychology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (101 citations), Applied Psychology (58 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (103 citations) and Social Psychology (150 citations). Kyle A. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Scott Clifford, Peter DeScioli, Steven Pinker, Omar Sultan Haque, Julian De Freitas, Liane Young, Malte Persike and Bruce Bridgeman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology General, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior, Perception and Cognitive Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.