Kris Knorr

738 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 526 citations indexed

About

Kris Knorr is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Kris Knorr has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 526 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Education, 1 paper in Social Psychology and 1 paper in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Kris Knorr's work include Higher Education Practises and Engagement (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (6 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers). Kris Knorr is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Practises and Engagement (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (6 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers). Kris Knorr collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Kris Knorr's co-authors include Elizabeth Marquis, Lucy Mercer‐Mapstone, Breagh Cheng, Sophia Abbot, Kelly Matthews, Peter Felten, Varun Puri, Arshad Ahmad, Stephanie Wan and Jason C. S. Woo and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The International Journal for Academic Development and Canadian Journal of Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Kris Knorr

9 papers receiving 505 citations

Hit Papers

A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 100 200 300 400
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education
    2017 401 citations Lucy Mercer‐Mapstone, Kelly Matthews et al. International Journal for Students as Partners profile →

Peers

Kris Knorr
Sophia Abbot United States
Saranne Weller United Kingdom
Debra Coulson Australia
Patricia Cartney United Kingdom
Philip Carey United Kingdom
Davin Carr‐Chellman United States
An Verburgh Belgium
Ruth Dann United Kingdom
Kerry O’Regan Australia
Kay Martinez Australia
Sophia Abbot United States
Kris Knorr
Citations per year, relative to Kris Knorr Kris Knorr (= 1×) peers Sophia Abbot

Countries citing papers authored by Kris Knorr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kris Knorr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kris Knorr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kris Knorr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kris Knorr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kris Knorr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kris Knorr. The network helps show where Kris Knorr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kris Knorr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kris Knorr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kris Knorr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kris Knorr. Kris Knorr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Knorr, Kris, et al.. (2020). Seven principles for good practice in midterm student feedback. The International Journal for Academic Development. 25(4). 350–362. 3 indexed citations
2.
Knorr, Kris, et al.. (2020). The Impact of Program Structure and Goal Setting on Mentors’ Perceptions of Peer Mentorship in Academia. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 50(2). 24–38. 2 indexed citations
3.
Foran, Gabrielle, et al.. (2020). Evaluating factors contributing to positive partnership work in a students-as-consultants partnership program. International Journal for Students as Partners. 4(2). 27–44. 6 indexed citations
4.
Knorr, Kris, et al.. (2018). Three heads are better than one: Students, faculty, and educational developers as co-developers of Science curriculum. International Journal for Students as Partners. 2(1). 112–120. 13 indexed citations
5.
Marquis, Elizabeth, et al.. (2017). SoTL Research Fellows: Collaborative Pathfinding through Uncertain Terrain. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(3). 8 indexed citations
6.
Mercer‐Mapstone, Lucy, Kelly Matthews, Sophia Abbot, et al.. (2017). A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education. International Journal for Students as Partners. 1(1). 401 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Kenny, Natasha, et al.. (2017). Drawing on the Principles of SoTL to Illuminate a Path Forward for the Scholarship of Educational Development. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(2). 15 indexed citations
8.
Cockcroft, Robert, et al.. (2016). New Interdisciplinary Science Course for First-Year Faculty of Science Students: Overview and Preliminary Results from the Pilot. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9. 43–68. 1 indexed citations
9.
Marquis, Elizabeth, Varun Puri, Stephanie Wan, et al.. (2015). Navigating the threshold of student–staff partnerships: a case study from an Ontario teaching and learning institute. The International Journal for Academic Development. 21(1). 4–15. 77 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sophia Abbot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Saranne Weller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Debra Coulson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia Cartney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Philip Carey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Davin Carr‐Chellman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by An Verburgh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruth Dann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kerry O’Regan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kay Martinez
Rankless by CCL
2026