Klaus Lorentz

52 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Klaus Lorentz
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 48
  • Clinical Biochemistry 65
  • Nephrology 43
  • Biotechnology 47
  • Biochemistry 32
Replace Lawrence V. Hankes with:
Lawrence V. Hankes United States
Katharina Steiner United States
Harold A. Neufeld United States
E. Myles Glenn United States
Richard J L Bondar United States
JAN PACHECKA Poland
Soyoung Lee South Korea
S K Gross United States
Antonín Jindra Czechia
Hisakuni Hashimoto Japan
Klaus Lorentz relative to Lawrence V. Hankes United States Lawrence V. Hankes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Lawrence V. Hankes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus Lorentz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus Lorentz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus Lorentz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus Lorentz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus Lorentz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus Lorentz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus Lorentz. The network helps show where Klaus Lorentz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Klaus Lorentz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Klaus Lorentz Line = papers co-authored together Klaus Lorentz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199971
2 199869
3 198261
4 197951
5 197641
6 196739
7 198625
8 200024
9 197421
10 197016
11 197412
12 197512
13 19759
14 19989
15 19798
16 19798
17 19968
18 20018
19 20028
20 19767

About Klaus Lorentz

Klaus Lorentz is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 65 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (13 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (10 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (8 papers), Digestive system and related health (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers) and Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (65 citations), Nephrology (43 citations), Biotechnology (47 citations) and Biochemistry (32 citations). Klaus Lorentz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Florian Renner, W.O. Berndt, Thomas F Weiss, Wolfgang Wirtz, Jürgen Voß, Francesca Canalías, F.-Javier Gella, Ferruccio Ceriotti, Oswald Sonntag and Eberhard Henkel. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Clinica Chimica Acta, Clinical Chemistry, Journal of Molecular Medicine and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact