Kimberly Kuiper
About
In The Last Decade
Kimberly Kuiper
6 papers receiving 245 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Clinical Psychology 199
- General Health Professions 65
- Health 61
- Safety Research 59
- Sociology and Political Science 54
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Kuiper
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Kuiper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Kuiper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Kuiper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Kuiper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Kuiper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Kuiper. The network helps show where Kimberly Kuiper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly Kuiper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly Kuiper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly Kuiper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly Kuiper. Kimberly Kuiper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | Risk factors for child neglect: A meta-analytic review breakdown → | 221 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.