Genes Brain & Behavior

1.6k papers and 58.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Genes Brain & Behavior in the last decades have received a total of 58.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Genes Brain & Behavior usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (619 papers), Molecular Biology (520 papers) and Genetics (445 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (286 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (241 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (215 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Genes Brain & Behavior are John L.R. Rubenstein, Michael M. Merzenich, Jacqueline N. Crawley, Wim E. Crusio, Su Guo, John C. Crabbe, Sheryl S. Moy, Jessica J. Nadler, Terry Magnuson and Richard E. Brown.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Genes Brain & Behavior

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Genes Brain & Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Genes Brain & Behavior.

Countries where authors publish in Genes Brain & Behavior

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Genes Brain & Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Genes Brain & Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genes Brain & Behavior more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025