Kim Williams

864 total citations
65 papers, 422 citations indexed

About

Kim Williams is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Architecture and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Williams has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 422 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts, 11 papers in Architecture and 7 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Kim Williams's work include Architecture and Art History Studies (16 papers), Architecture and Computational Design (11 papers) and Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (6 papers). Kim Williams is often cited by papers focused on Architecture and Art History Studies (16 papers), Architecture and Computational Design (11 papers) and Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (6 papers). Kim Williams collaborates with scholars based in Italy, United States and Australia. Kim Williams's co-authors include Josie Geller, Suja Srikameswaran, Natasha J. Olby, Emily H. Griffith, Michael J. Ostwald, Karen R. Muñana, Peter J. Early, Christopher L. Mariani, Scott McLean and Joe Fenn and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, British Journal of Dermatology and Injury.

In The Last Decade

Kim Williams

58 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Kim Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Small Animals 124
  • Clinical Psychology 114
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 84
  • Surgery 54
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 38
Replace Peter Brown with:
Peter Brown United Kingdom
Peter Holler Austria
Julie Jones-Diette United Kingdom
Christian Thiele Germany
Amit Mohan India
Susan Fraser United Kingdom
Laura Hutchinson United States
Caio Sain Vallio Brazil
Ken Beath Australia
Brian Gordon United States
Peter Brown United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Kim Williams
Kim Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Kim Williams
Kim Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Williams. The network helps show where Kim Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Williams. Kim Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 2
3 2
4 8
5 34
6 17
7 4
8 12
9 23
10 19
11 2
12 47
13 1
14
Plagiary in the Renaissance
4
15
The Shape of Divinity.
2
16 60
17
The Well-Rounded Architect: Spheres and Circles in Architectural Design
0
18 11
19
Architecture and Mathematics: Art, Music and Science
1
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026