Emergency Medicine Australasia

2.1k papers and 22.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia in the last decades have received a total of 22.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia usually cover Emergency Medicine (1.2k papers), General Health Professions (384 papers) and Surgery (365 papers) specifically the topics of Emergency and Acute Care Studies (823 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (424 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (219 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Emergency Medicine Australasia are Anne‐Maree Kelly, Franz E Babl, David McD Taylor, Biswadev Mitra, Andis Graudins, Daniel M Fatovich, Peter Jones, Peter Cameron, Andrew W Dent and Michael Dinh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia.

Countries where authors publish in Emergency Medicine Australasia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emergency Medicine Australasia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emergency Medicine Australasia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025