Emergency Medicine Australasia

37.2k citations
3.3k papers · · active since 1991

Impact in

    • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
    • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
    • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
    • Poisoning and overdose treatments
    • Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
    • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents

Papers in

Emergency Medicine Australasia

2.4k papers receiving 27.7k citations

Peers

Emergency Medicine Australasia
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Emergency Medicine 7.7k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1.7k
  • Emergency Medical Services 1.4k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 826
  • Health Informatics 169
Replace Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine with:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Canada
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine United States
European Journal of Emergency Medicine United Kingdom
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America United States
BMC Emergency Medicine United States
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine Norway
Journal of Emergency Nursing United States
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine United States
Current Opinion in Critical Care United States
JAMA Surgery United States
Emergency Medicine Australasia relative to Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Canada Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Emergency Medicine Australasia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emergency Medicine Australasia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emergency Medicine Australasia more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia.

About Emergency Medicine Australasia

The 3.3k papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia in the last decades have received a total of 37.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Emergency Medicine Australasia usually cover Emergency Medicine (928 papers), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (77 papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (124 papers), Emergency Medical Services (99 papers) and Family Practice (14 papers) specifically the topics of Emergency and Acute Care Studies (422 papers), Emergency Medicine Education and Research (190 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (106 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (103 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (81 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (81 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (55 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Emergency Medicine Australasia are Anne‐Maree Kelly, Anna Holdgate, David McD Taylor, Peter Alistair Cameron, George Alexander Jelinek, Franz E Babl, Peter Sprivulis, Annette L. Beautrais, Daniel M Fatovich and Biswadev Mitra.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact