Kim Brandes
- Family Practice top 5%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance 1
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 2
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 9
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 4
-
- Family Support in Illness 3
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 3
-
- Empathy and Medical Education 2
-
- Cancer survivorship and care 2
- Co-authors
- Barbara MullanAnnemiek J. LinnJulia C.M. van WeertPhyllis ButowMartin S. HaggerAntonia RichEdith G. SmitRonald M. Epstein
- Journals
- Patient Education and Counseling (4 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Journal of Behavioral Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kim Brandes
11 papers receiving 559 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Family Practice 57
- Applied Psychology 103
- General Health Professions 265
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 210
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Brandes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Brandes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Brandes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Brandes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Brandes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Brandes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Brandes. The network helps show where Kim Brandes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Kim Brandes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 4 | Communicating about concerns in oncology | 2017 | 1 |
| 5 | 2017 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 174 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 48 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 168 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 53 |
About Kim Brandes
Kim Brandes is a scholar working on Family Practice, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (57 citations), Applied Psychology (103 citations), General Health Professions (265 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (210 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (20 citations). Kim Brandes has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Mullan, Annemiek J. Linn, Julia C.M. van Weert, Phyllis Butow, Martin S. Hagger, Antonia Rich, Edith G. Smit, Ronald M. Epstein, Adam Walczak and Martin H.N. Tattersall. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Psycho-Oncology and Health Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.