Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Introducing COBRAs
20111.0k citationsMarjolein Moorman, Edith G. Smit et al.International Journal of Advertisingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith G. Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith G. Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith G. Smit more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith G. Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith G. Smit. The network helps show where Edith G. Smit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith G. Smit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith G. Smit.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith G. Smit based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edith G. Smit. Edith G. Smit is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smit, Edith G., et al.. (2014). Facebook in higher education: An Auto ethnographic journey entering into edu-social space. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Meijers, Marijn H. C., Peeter W.J. Verlegh, Marret K. Noordewier, & Edith G. Smit. (2013). Consuming Green, Living Green? Boundary Conditions of the Licensing Effect.. ACR European Advances.
Masłowska, Ewa, Edith G. Smit, & Bas van den Putte. (2011). Is Personalized Communication Superior? the Effectiveness of Personalization and the Role of Consumers’ Characteristics. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances.3 indexed citations
Neijens, Peter & Edith G. Smit. (2002). Publieksreacties op non-spot advertising: Invloed van kijkers- en programmakenmerken. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschappen. 30(3). 195–211.1 indexed citations
19.
Smit, Edith G., et al.. (1995). Genetic stability, conjugal transfer and expression of heterologous DNA inserted into different genomic locations of Pseudomonas fluorescens introduced into soil. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 26. 169–179.2 indexed citations
20.
Richaume, Agnès, Edith G. Smit, G. Faurie, & Jan Dirk van Elsas. (1992). Influence of soil type on the transfer of RP4p from Pseudomonas fluorescens to indigenous bacteria.. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 101. 281–292.39 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.