Kevin M. Pilgrim
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Applied Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter Haı̈ssinskyLei TanLaura DeMarcoRobert L. DevaneyChristopher J. BishopJoshua LevyJ. W. CannonWilliam Floyd
- Topics
- Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (25 papers)Geometric and Algebraic Topology (12 papers)Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (10 papers)
- Journals
- Lecture notes in mathematicsAdvances in MathematicsProceedings of the American Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Kevin M. Pilgrim
30 papers receiving 163 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
- Mathematical Physics 163
- Geometry and Topology 141
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 50
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 42
- Applied Mathematics 41
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin M. Pilgrim
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin M. Pilgrim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin M. Pilgrim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin M. Pilgrim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin M. Pilgrim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin M. Pilgrim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin M. Pilgrim. The network helps show where Kevin M. Pilgrim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin M. Pilgrim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin M. Pilgrim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin M. Pilgrim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin M. Pilgrim. Kevin M. Pilgrim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Semigroups of Branched Mapping Classes: Dynamics and Geometry | 1 |
| 6 | QUASISYMMETRICALLY INEQUIVALENT HYPERBOLIC JULIA SETS | 10 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Kevin M. Pilgrim
Kevin M. Pilgrim is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (25 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (12 papers) and Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (163 citations), Geometry and Topology (141 citations) and Applied Mathematics (41 citations). Kevin M. Pilgrim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Haı̈ssinsky, Lei Tan, Laura DeMarco, Robert L. Devaney, Christopher J. Bishop, Joshua Levy, J. W. Cannon, William Floyd, Walter Parry and Selim Berker. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in mathematics, Advances in Mathematics and Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.