Christopher J. Bishop
- Geometry and Topology top 1%
- Applied Mathematics top 1%
- Mathematical Physics top 2%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter W. JonesYuval PeresJames K. WettererМатти ВуориненVladimir GutlyanskiîОлли МартиоJeremy T. TysonTim Steger
- Topics
- Analytic and geometric function theory (29 papers)Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (23 papers)Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Bishop
71 papers receiving 786 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Geometry and Topology 548
- Applied Mathematics 546
- Mathematical Physics 436
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 126
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 55
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Bishop. The network helps show where Christopher J. Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher J. Bishop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher J. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher J. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher J. Bishop. Christopher J. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | BILIPSCHITZ APPROXIMATIONS OF QUASICONFORMAL MAPS | 7 |
| 11 | Locally minimal sets for conformal dimension | 10 |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | QUASICONFORMAL MAPPINGS WHICH INCREASE DIMENSION | 23 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Christopher J. Bishop
Christopher J. Bishop is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 76 papers that have together received 893 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic and geometric function theory (29 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (23 papers) and Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (548 citations), Applied Mathematics (546 citations) and Mathematical Physics (436 citations). Christopher J. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter W. Jones, Yuval Peres, James K. Wetterer, Матти Вуоринен, Vladimir Gutlyanskiî, Олли Мартио, Jeremy T. Tyson, Tim Steger, Lennart Carleson and John B. Garnett. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Annals of Mathematics and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.