Kerri Wright

994 citations
56 papers · 790 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Kerri Wright

51 papers receiving 716 citations

Peers

Kerri Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 339
  • Emergency Medical Services 360
  • Research and Theory 24
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 37
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
Replace Emanuele Di Simone with:
Emanuele Di Simone Italy
Noemi Giannetta Italy
Sarah Crowe Canada
Fatemeh Hajibabaee Iran
Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani Brazil
Carolyn Hayes Australia
Sara Dionisi Italy
Rachel Langdon Australia
Gerald E. Meyer United States
Rachel King United Kingdom
Kerri Wright relative to Emanuele Di Simone Italy Emanuele Di Simone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Emanuele Di Simone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kerri Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kerri Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kerri Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kerri Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kerri Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kerri Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kerri Wright. The network helps show where Kerri Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Kerri Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kerri Wright Line = papers co-authored together Kerri Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200684
2 200969
3
Frailty: a public health perspective.
199657
4 200551
5 200643
6 200842
7 200939
8 200438
9 200934
10 200234
11 200728
12 200728
13 201426
14 200823
15 200618
16 201115
17 200515
18 201114
19 201312
20 200810

About Kerri Wright

Kerri Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Education and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 56 papers that have together received 790 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (15 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (14 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers) and Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (339 citations), Emergency Medical Services (360 citations), Research and Theory (24 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (37 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations). Kerri Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maureen Cava, Ivan Brown, Rebecca Renwick, Dennis Raphael, Jeremy Dale, Etienne Vermeire, Hilary Hearnshaw, Paul Van Royen, Jackie Sturt and Liz Meerabeau. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nursing Standard, Diabetic Medicine, Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) and British Journal of Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact