This map shows the geographic impact of Kerman Calvo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kerman Calvo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kerman Calvo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kerman Calvo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kerman Calvo. The network helps show where Kerman Calvo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kerman Calvo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kerman Calvo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kerman Calvo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kerman Calvo. Kerman Calvo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Calvo, Kerman, et al.. (2020). ACTITUDES HACIA LA REGULARIZACIÓN DE LA PROSTITUCIÓN EN ESPAÑA: UNA APROXIMACIÓN A PARTIR DE DATOS DE ENCUESTA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Calvo, Kerman. (2016). Una nueva política para una democracia de género en España. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 1–14.1 indexed citations
7.
Calvo, Kerman, et al.. (2015). Actitudes hacia la regularización de la prostitución en España. 17. 78–99.2 indexed citations
8.
Calvo, Kerman, et al.. (2015). Limitaciones y exclusiones en la institucionalización de la indignación: del 15-M a Podemos. 115–122.8 indexed citations
9.
Calvo, Kerman & José Ramón Montero Gibert. (2013). Cuando ser conservador ya no es un problema: religiosidad, ideología y voto en las elecciones generales de 2000. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
10.
Calvo, Kerman. (2010). Movimientos Sociales, y reconocimiento de derechos civiles: la legalización del matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en España.. Revista de Estudios Políticos. 137–167.3 indexed citations
Calvo, Kerman, Álvaro Martínez, & José Ramón Montero Gibert. (2010). A difficult friendship: religiosity, ideology, and vote in Spain. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).2 indexed citations
13.
Gibert, José Ramón Montero, Kerman Calvo, & Álvaro Martínez. (2008). El voto religioso en España y Portugal. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
14.
Calvo, Kerman. (2008). Ethnicity and violence, the case of radical basque nationalism. Revista de Estudios Políticos. 229–237.32 indexed citations
15.
Gibert, José Ramón Montero, Kerman Calvo, & Álvaro Martínez. (2008). El voto religioso en España y Portugal. Revista Internacional de Sociología. 66(51). 19–54.18 indexed citations
16.
Sunkin, Maurice, Kerman Calvo, Lucinda Platt, & Todd Landman. (2007). Mapping the use of judicial review to challenge local authorities in England and Wales. Public law. 545–567.7 indexed citations
17.
Calvo, Kerman, et al.. (2006). Eadem sed Aliter : Religious Voting in Portugal and Spain. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).3 indexed citations
18.
Calvo, Kerman. (2005). Matrimonio homosexual y ciudadanía. Claves de razón práctica. 32–39.1 indexed citations
19.
Gibert, José Ramón Montero & Kerman Calvo. (2005). Valores y religiosidad. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 147–170.1 indexed citations
20.
Calvo, Kerman. (2001). El movimiento homosexual en a trasición a la democracia en España. 85–108.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.