Kent Neuenschwander

575 citations
19 papers · 446 indexed · h-index 12
Topics
Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers)Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (4 papers)Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (3 papers)
Partner nations
United StatesFrance

In The Last Decade

Kent Neuenschwander

18 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Kent Neuenschwander
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Organic Chemistry 248
  • Molecular Biology 181
  • Surgery 65
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 55
  • Cancer Research 35
Replace James L. Stanton with:
James L. Stanton Switzerland
Hiroki Gunji Japan
M. L. HOEFLE United States
Barry H. Levine United States
John W. Benbow United States
Hiroyuki Sugumi Japan
Karin Pleban Austria
David G. Loughhead United States
Matthew P. Bourbeau United States
G. Chandrasekara Reddy United States
Kent Neuenschwander relative to James L. Stanton Switzerland James L. Stanton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
James L. Stanton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kent Neuenschwander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kent Neuenschwander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kent Neuenschwander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kent Neuenschwander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kent Neuenschwander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kent Neuenschwander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kent Neuenschwander. The network helps show where Kent Neuenschwander may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kent Neuenschwander

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kent Neuenschwander. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kent Neuenschwander based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kent Neuenschwander. Kent Neuenschwander is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 4
3 20
4 30
5 14
6 0
7 60
8 54
9 16
10 28
11 20
12 2
13 3
14 32
15 42
16 88
17 3
18 10
19 16

About Kent Neuenschwander

Kent Neuenschwander is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Toxicology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (4 papers) and Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (248 citations), Toxicology (14 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (55 citations). Kent Neuenschwander has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include George A. Kraus, Bruce D. Roth, Michael Täschner, Kevin Frazier, C. Dale Poulter, Scott A. Biller, Dilip Amin, Mark H. Perrone, Saul Needle and Martin P. Maguire. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026