Kenneth R. Paap

6.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
65 papers, 4.0k citations indexed

About

Kenneth R. Paap is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kenneth R. Paap has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 4.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 34 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 16 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kenneth R. Paap's work include Reading and Literacy Development (29 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (27 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers). Kenneth R. Paap is often cited by papers focused on Reading and Literacy Development (29 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (27 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers). Kenneth R. Paap collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Kenneth R. Paap's co-authors include Oliver Sawi, Hunter A. Johnson, Sandra L. Newsome, Ronald W. Noel, Roger W. Schvaneveldt, James E. McDonald, Sheldon M. Ebenholtz, William C. Ogden, Jerry T. Ball and Lauren Mason and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychological Review and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Kenneth R. Paap

64 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Hit Papers

There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage i... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 2015 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kenneth R. Paap United States 28 3.0k 2.6k 954 277 246 65 4.0k
Remo Job Italy 31 2.4k 0.8× 1.6k 0.6× 837 0.9× 242 0.9× 377 1.5× 124 3.2k
Greg B. Simpson United States 24 3.2k 1.0× 2.6k 1.0× 1.4k 1.5× 734 2.6× 427 1.7× 46 4.3k
Rita Sloan Berndt United States 33 3.9k 1.3× 2.9k 1.1× 643 0.7× 329 1.2× 522 2.1× 74 4.5k
Jon Andoni Duñabeitia Spain 43 3.7k 1.2× 3.2k 1.2× 1.3k 1.3× 446 1.6× 448 1.8× 183 5.1k
M. Teresa Bajo Spain 34 2.6k 0.9× 1.6k 0.6× 955 1.0× 394 1.4× 277 1.1× 165 3.7k
Deborah M. Burke United States 29 3.3k 1.1× 2.0k 0.7× 949 1.0× 363 1.3× 310 1.3× 48 4.1k
Jefferson Provost United States 6 2.0k 0.7× 986 0.4× 929 1.0× 243 0.9× 333 1.4× 7 2.7k
Patrick Bonin France 32 2.4k 0.8× 2.1k 0.8× 998 1.0× 546 2.0× 326 1.3× 110 3.4k
Alan Allport United Kingdom 21 2.9k 1.0× 1.2k 0.5× 786 0.8× 140 0.5× 401 1.6× 28 3.4k
Guy C. Van Orden United States 32 3.4k 1.1× 3.3k 1.3× 1.2k 1.3× 747 2.7× 390 1.6× 57 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth R. Paap

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth R. Paap's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth R. Paap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth R. Paap more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth R. Paap

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth R. Paap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth R. Paap. The network helps show where Kenneth R. Paap may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth R. Paap

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth R. Paap. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth R. Paap based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth R. Paap. Kenneth R. Paap is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Paap, Kenneth R.. (2024). Cognitive Reserve? Cognitive Capacity!. Brain Sciences. 14(12). 1265–1265. 1 indexed citations
3.
Paap, Kenneth R., et al.. (2024). Bilingualism, like other types of brain training, does not produce far transfer: It all fits together. International Journal of Bilingualism. 29(1). 114–127. 2 indexed citations
4.
Suri, Gaurav & Kenneth R. Paap. (2024). A computational account of self-control. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 123. 102886–102886.
5.
Paap, Kenneth R., et al.. (2020). Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 5(1). 7–7. 62 indexed citations
6.
Paap, Kenneth R., et al.. (2020). The alchemy of confirmation bias transmutes expectations into bilingual advantages: A tale of two new meta-analyses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 73(8). 1290–1299. 30 indexed citations
7.
Paap, Kenneth R., et al.. (2018). Bilingual Advantages in Inhibition or Selective Attention: More Challenges. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1409–1409. 39 indexed citations
8.
Paap, Kenneth R.. (2018). No coherent evidence for bilingual advantages in executive functioning.. Cognitive Science. 1 indexed citations
9.
Paap, Kenneth R. & Oliver Sawi. (2016). The role of test-retest reliability in measuring individual and group differences in executive functioning. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 274. 81–93. 96 indexed citations
10.
Paap, Kenneth R., Hunter A. Johnson, & Oliver Sawi. (2015). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex. 69. 265–278. 490 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Paap, Kenneth R., et al.. (2015). Beyond Panglossian Optimism: Larger N2 Amplitudes Probably Signal a Bilingual Disadvantage in Conflict Monitoring. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 1–6. 9 indexed citations
13.
Paap, Kenneth R., et al.. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology. 66(2). 232–258. 716 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Paap, Kenneth R., et al.. (2000). Neighborhood frequency does affect performance in the Reicher task: Encoding or decision?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 26(6). 1691–1720. 21 indexed citations
15.
Paap, Kenneth R., et al.. (1999). Discrete threshold versus continuous strength models of perceptual recognition.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 53(4). 277–293. 9 indexed citations
16.
Paap, Kenneth R. & Ronald W. Noel. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research. 53(1). 13–24. 251 indexed citations
17.
Paap, Kenneth R. & Ronald W. Noel. (1989). Dual-route models of print to sound-still a good horse race. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 27(6). 3 indexed citations
18.
Paap, Kenneth R.. (1986). The pilfering of awareness and guilt by association. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 9(1). 45–46. 5 indexed citations
19.
Paap, Kenneth R. & Sandra L. Newsome. (1980). Do small visual angles produce a word superiority effect or differential lateral masking?. Memory & Cognition. 8(1). 1–14. 15 indexed citations
20.
Paap, Kenneth R. & Sheldon M. Ebenholtz. (1976). Perceptual consequences of potentiation in the extraocular muscles: An alternative explanation for adaptation to wedge prisms.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 2(4). 457–468. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026