Kenneth Boyd

1.3k citations
22 papers · 692 indexed · h-index 8

Kenneth Boyd

18 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

Kenneth Boyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • General Health Professions 156
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 156
  • Pharmacy 20
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
  • Philosophy 36
Replace Marja van Vliet with:
Marja van Vliet Netherlands
Dana J. Lawrence United States
Yo Han Lee South Korea
Marianna Masiero Italy
Joost Heyink Netherlands
Robert V. Carlson United Kingdom
Philip M. Moody United States
Dorothea Niehoff Germany
Caroline Mitchell United Kingdom
Mariusz Gujski Poland
Kenneth Boyd relative to Marja van Vliet Netherlands Marja van Vliet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marja van Vliet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Boyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Boyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Boyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Boyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Boyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Boyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Boyd. The network helps show where Kenneth Boyd may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Boyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth Boyd Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth Boyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20226
2 20210
3 20200
4 20202
5 20141
6 20132
7
Levi's Challenge and Peirce's Theory/Practice Distinction
20125
8 20074
9 200517
10 2004477
11 200213
12 2000104
13 19992
14 19961
15 19947
16 199011
17 19901
18 19874
19
Life before birth: A search for consensus on abortion and the treatment of infertility
19862
20
The Ethics of resource allocation in health care
19797

About Kenneth Boyd

Kenneth Boyd is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Reproductive Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, History and Philosophy of Science and Molecular Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 692 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Disaster Response and Management (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Public Health Policies and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (156 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (156 citations), Pharmacy (20 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations) and Philosophy (36 citations). Kenneth Boyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David J. Webb, Robert V. Carlson, Alan Davies, Mark A. Taggart, Carol Currie, Nadja van Ginneken, Luisa M Pettigrew, Roger Higgs, Margaret Lloyd and Nuno Silva. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Language Testing and Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026