Philip M. Moody

1.1k citations
27 papers · 865 indexed · h-index 15

Philip M. Moody

26 papers receiving 756 citations

Peers

Philip M. Moody
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 168
  • Speech and Hearing 85
  • Orthodontics 52
  • General Health Professions 233
  • Applied Psychology 41
Replace Cindy L. K. Lam with:
Cindy L. K. Lam Hong Kong
Isabel Silva Portugal
Maite Ferrando Spain
Yolanda Andreu Spain
John C. Licciardone United States
Candy Guiguet‐Auclair France
Joost Heyink Netherlands
Alireza Jafari Iran
Maria Nyholm Sweden
Anders Wikman Sweden
Philip M. Moody relative to Cindy L. K. Lam Hong Kong Cindy L. K. Lam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.6×
Cindy L. K. Lam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Moody

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Moody's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Moody with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Moody more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Moody

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Moody. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Moody. The network helps show where Philip M. Moody may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Philip M. Moody, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip M. Moody Line = papers co-authored together Philip M. Moody links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Health locus of control beliefs and smoking among male Kuwaiti government employees.
20069
2 200527
3
Epidemiology of smoking among Kuwaiti adults: prevalence, characteristics, and attitudes.
2000141
4 199827
5 199818
6 19934
7 19922
8 1992115
9 19876
10 1985131
11 19847
12 19831
13 198319
14 198383
15 198270
16 19803
17 197622
18
Attitudes of nurses and nursing students toward alcoholism treatment.
197116
19 197113
20 19701

About Philip M. Moody

Philip M. Moody is a scholar working on Complementary and Manual Therapy, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Medical Laboratory Technology, Speech and Hearing and Health, having authored 27 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (4 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Musicians’ Health and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (168 citations), Speech and Hearing (85 citations), Orthodontics (52 citations), General Health Professions (233 citations) and Applied Psychology (41 citations). Philip M. Moody has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Kuwait. Frequent co-authors include David Mechanic, John T. Kemper, Jeffrey P. Okeson, Anjum Memon, John V. Haley, Mahmoud Al-Bustan, Robert M. Gray, Thomas C. Calhoun, Hanan E. Badr and John Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Health Services Research and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026