Catherine Shakespeare

2.9k total citations
38 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Catherine Shakespeare is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine Shakespeare has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Accounting, 19 papers in Strategy and Management and 19 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Catherine Shakespeare's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (25 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (15 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (14 papers). Catherine Shakespeare is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (25 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (15 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (14 papers). Catherine Shakespeare collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Portugal. Catherine Shakespeare's co-authors include Linda A. Myers, Jacqueline S. Hammersley, Patricia Dechow, Mark T. Soliman, William H. Beaver, Thomas J. Linsmeier, Christine Petrovits, Dennis J. Chambers, Theodore Sougiannis and Wayne R. Landsman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, The Accounting Review and Accounting Organizations and Society.

In The Last Decade

Catherine Shakespeare

35 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Catherine Shakespeare
Steven Balsam United States
Isabel Yanyan Wang United States
Edward P. Swanson United States
Jayanthi Krishnan United States
Stephen Stubben United States
Jan Barton United States
Dmitri Byzalov United States
Chee Yeow Lim Singapore
Steven Balsam United States
Catherine Shakespeare
Citations per year, relative to Catherine Shakespeare Catherine Shakespeare (= 1×) peers Steven Balsam

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Shakespeare

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Shakespeare's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Shakespeare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Shakespeare more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Shakespeare

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Shakespeare. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Shakespeare. The network helps show where Catherine Shakespeare may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Shakespeare

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Shakespeare. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Shakespeare based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Shakespeare. Catherine Shakespeare is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shakespeare, Catherine, et al.. (2025). Accounting choice in measurement and comparability: an examination of the effect of the fair value option. Review of Accounting Studies. 30(2). 1592–1637.
2.
Shakespeare, Catherine, et al.. (2024). Evaluation of community nurse-led traumatic tube displacements. British Journal of Community Nursing. 29(4). 162–170. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hendricks, Bradley E., et al.. (2022). Anticipatory Effects around Proposed Regulation: Evidence from Basel III. The Accounting Review. 98(1). 285–315. 2 indexed citations
4.
Linsmeier, Thomas J., et al.. (2020). Investors' Assessment of the Dilution and Solvency Effects of Hybrid Instruments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
5.
Shakespeare, Catherine, et al.. (2016). Responding to Regulatory Uncertainty: Evidence from Basel III. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 2 indexed citations
6.
Hendricks, Bradley E. & Catherine Shakespeare. (2013). A Discussion of ‘Financial Reporting of Fair Value Based on Model Inputs versus Market Inputs: Evidence From Mortgage Servicing Rights’. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
7.
Bradshaw, Mark T., Daniel A. Bens, Carol Ann Frost, et al.. (2013). Financial Reporting Policy Committee of the American Accounting Association's Financial Accounting and Reporting Section: Accounting Standard Setting for Private Companies. Accounting Horizons. 28(1). 175–192. 22 indexed citations
8.
Hendricks, Bradley E., et al.. (2013). The Effects of Regulation When Managers Have Discretion: Evidence from the Announcement of Basel III. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hendricks, Bradley E. & Catherine Shakespeare. (2013). Discussion of “The financial reporting of fair value based on managerial inputs versus market inputs: evidence from mortgage servicing rights”. Review of Accounting Studies. 18(3). 859–867. 10 indexed citations
10.
Koonce, Lisa, Karen K. Nelson, & Catherine Shakespeare. (2011). Judging the Relevance of Fair Value for Financial Instruments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations
11.
Amiram, Dan, Wayne R. Landsman, Ken V. Peasnell, & Catherine Shakespeare. (2011). Market Reaction to Securitization Retained Interest Impairments during the Financial Crisis of 2007-2008: Are Implicit Guarantees Worth the Paper They’re Not Written On?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 13 indexed citations
12.
Blankespoor, Elizabeth, Thomas J. Linsmeier, Kathy R. Petroni, & Catherine Shakespeare. (2011). Fair Value Accounting for Financial Instruments: Does it Improve the Association Between Bank Leverage and Credit Risk?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 39 indexed citations
13.
Petrovits, Christine, et al.. (2010). The Causes and Consequences of Internal Control Problems in Nonprofit Organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal. 42 indexed citations
14.
Shakespeare, Catherine. (2008). Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Five Years On: What Have We Learned?. 3(2). 333. 2 indexed citations
15.
Hammersley, Jacqueline S., Linda A. Myers, & Catherine Shakespeare. (2007). Market Reactions to the Disclosure of Internal Control Weaknesses and to the Characteristics of those Weaknesses under Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. SSRN Electronic Journal. 106 indexed citations
16.
Hammersley, Jacqueline S., Linda A. Myers, & Catherine Shakespeare. (2007). Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Review of Accounting Studies. 13(1). 141–165. 446 indexed citations
17.
Beaver, William H., Catherine Shakespeare, & Mark T. Soliman. (2006). Differential properties in the ratings of certified versus non-certified bond-rating agencies. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 42(3). 303–334. 249 indexed citations
18.
Beaver, William H., Catherine Shakespeare, & Mark T. Soliman. (2006). Differential Properties in the Ratings of Certified vs. Non-Certified Bond Rating Agencies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 65 indexed citations
19.
Chambers, Dennis J., Thomas J. Linsmeier, Catherine Shakespeare, & Theodore Sougiannis. (2006). An Evaluation of Sfas No. 130 Comprehensive Income Disclosures. SSRN Electronic Journal. 75 indexed citations
20.
Shakespeare, Catherine. (2002). Accounting for asset securitizations : fair values and earnings management. UMI Dissertation Services eBooks. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026