Ken Moores

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ken Moores
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.1k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 732
  • Accounting 897
  • Business and International Management 64
  • Management Information Systems 287
Replace Birgit Feldbauer‐Durstmüller with:
Birgit Feldbauer‐Durstmüller Austria
Tensie Steijvers Belgium
Claudio Romano Australia
Christine Mitter Austria
Pietro Mazzola Italy
Rajeswararao Chaganti United States
Alexander Keßler Austria
Jon I. Martínez Chile
Vance H. Fried United States
Gordon Murray United Kingdom
Ken Moores relative to Birgit Feldbauer‐Durstmüller Austria Birgit Feldbauer‐Durstmüller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Birgit Feldbauer‐Durstmüller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Moores

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Moores's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Moores with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Moores more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Moores

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Moores. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Moores. The network helps show where Ken Moores may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ken Moores, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Moores Line = papers co-authored together Ken Moores links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001324
2 2010218
3 2006201
4 2009143
5 2000116
6 201076
7 201169
8
Learning Family Business: Paradoxes and Pathways
200349
9 201842
10 201027
11 201023
12 200920
13 200919
14 200219
15 200918
16 201017
17 201016
18 202014
19 201012
20 200912

About Ken Moores

Ken Moores is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting, Management Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Business Performance and Succession (38 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (26 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (21 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (1 paper) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.1k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (732 citations), Accounting (897 citations), Business and International Management (64 citations) and Management Information Systems (287 citations). Ken Moores has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Justin B. Craig, Susana Yuen, Carlo Salvato, Mary Barrett, Joseph M. Mula, Francesco Barbera, Martin R. W. Hiebl, Martin Quinn, Keith Duncan and Carole Howorth. Their work appears in journals such as Family Business Review, Journal of Management & Organization, Journal of Family Business Strategy, Accounting Organizations and Society and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact