This map shows the geographic impact of Kelley Loper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelley Loper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelley Loper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelley Loper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelley Loper. The network helps show where Kelley Loper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelley Loper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelley Loper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelley Loper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kelley Loper. Kelley Loper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Loper, Kelley. (2019). Human Rights and Substantive Equality: Prospects for Same-Sex Relationship Recognition in Hong Kong. North Carolina Journal of International Law. 44(2). 273.2 indexed citations
4.
Loper, Kelley, et al.. (2019). 公眾對跨性別人士及保障跨性別人士的反歧視立法之民意調查 (Public Attitudes Towards Transgender People and Antidiscrimination Legislation). SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Loper, Kelley, et al.. (2019). Public Attitudes Towards Transgender People and Antidiscrimination Legislation. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
6.
Lau, Holning, et al.. (2018). 香港市民過去四年（2013-2017 年）對同性伴侶權利的支持度有所提升, 目前超過半數市民支持同性婚姻 (Support in Hong Kong for Same-Sex Couples’ Rights Grew Over Four Years (2013-2017), Over Half of People in Hong Kong Now Support Same-Sex Marriage). SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
7.
Lau, Charles, et al.. (2018). Support in Hong Kong for Same-Sex Couples’ Rights Grew Over Four Years (2013-2017), Over Half of People in Hong Kong Now Support Same-Sex Marriage. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Loper, Kelley, et al.. (2014). Research Shows a Majority of People in Hong Kong Support Gay and Lesbian Couples’ Rights, Not Necessarily Marriage. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
12.
Loper, Kelley, et al.. (2014). Public Attitudes Towards Gays and Lesbians and Towards Sexual Orientation Anti-Discrimination Legislation. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
13.
Loper, Kelley. (2011). Substantive Equality in International Human Rights Law and Its Relevance for the Resolution of Tibetan Autonomy Claims. North Carolina Journal of International Law. 37(1). 1.
Loper, Kelley. (2009). Toward Comprehensive Refugee Legislation in Hong Kong? Reflections on Reform of the 'Torture Screening' Procedures. The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong).3 indexed citations
17.
Loper, Kelley. (2008). One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? The Dilemma of Hong Kong's Draft Race Discrimination Legislation. The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong).
18.
Loper, Kelley. (2004). Race and equality: a study of ethnic minorities in Hong Kong's education system : project report and analysis. The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong).21 indexed citations
19.
Loper, Kelley. (2003). The Rights to Self-determination: Recent Developments in International Law and Their Relevance for the Tibetan People. The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong).1 indexed citations
20.
Loper, Kelley, et al.. (2002). Submission on the Proposals to Implement Article 23 of the Basic Law. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.