Keith G. Lumsden
- Education top 2%
- Accounting top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Co-authors
- Alex ScottG. L. BachDean T. JamisonC. D. HarburyAlec CairncrossJulian Le GrandGlyn Williams
- Topics
- Innovations in Educational Methods (18 papers)Accounting Education and Careers (4 papers)Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Keith G. Lumsden
33 papers receiving 382 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Education 376
- Accounting 89
- Economics and Econometrics 40
- Sociology and Political Science 22
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20
Countries citing papers authored by Keith G. Lumsden
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith G. Lumsden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith G. Lumsden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith G. Lumsden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keith G. Lumsden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith G. Lumsden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith G. Lumsden. The network helps show where Keith G. Lumsden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith G. Lumsden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith G. Lumsden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith G. Lumsden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith G. Lumsden. Keith G. Lumsden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Efficacy of Innovative Teaching Techniques in Economics: The U.K. Experience | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 145 | |
| 5 | Teaching macroeconomics by simulations | 2 |
| 6 | 63 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Efficiency in universities: The La Paz papers | 29 |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | Some Modern Myths in Teaching Economics: The U. K. Experience | 35 |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | The Efficiency of Programmed Learning in Teaching Economics: The Results of a Nationwide Experiment | 30 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | New developments in the teaching of economics | 30 |
| 20 | The gross national product | 1 |
About Keith G. Lumsden
Keith G. Lumsden is a scholar working on Education, Accounting and Computer Science Applications, having authored 35 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Educational Methods (18 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (4 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (376 citations), Accounting (89 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (19 citations). Keith G. Lumsden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Alex Scott, G. L. Bach, Dean T. Jamison, C. D. Harbury, Alec Cairncross, Julian Le Grand and Glyn Williams. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Management Science and The Economic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.