Alex Scott
- Education top 5%
- Accounting top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Building and Construction
- Co-authors
- Keith G. LumsdenAdam RysanekCynthia GirlingYuhao LuA. JenkinsGeoffrey WallRobert A. BeauregardDavid Matless
- Topics
- Innovations in Educational Methods (8 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers)Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Economic ReviewEnergy Economics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Alex Scott
17 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Education 223
- Accounting 64
- Economics and Econometrics 45
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 36
- Building and Construction 31
Countries citing papers authored by Alex Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alex Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Scott. The network helps show where Alex Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alex Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alex Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alex Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alex Scott. Alex Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | The Efficacy of Innovative Teaching Techniques in Economics: The U.K. Experience | 1 |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 145 | |
| 10 | Teaching macroeconomics by simulations | 2 |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | Economic efficiency in energy use | 3 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | The Comparative Advantage of Microcomputers in Economics Teaching. | 3 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 35 |
About Alex Scott
Alex Scott is a scholar working on Education, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting, having authored 18 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Educational Methods (8 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (223 citations), Accounting (64 citations) and Building and Construction (31 citations). Alex Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Keith G. Lumsden, Adam Rysanek, Cynthia Girling, Yuhao Lu, A. Jenkins, Geoffrey Wall, Robert A. Beauregard and David Matless. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Economic Review and Energy Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.