G. L. Bach

451 citations
31 papers · 260 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

G. L. Bach

24 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

G. L. Bach
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 98
  • Finance 48
  • Economics and Econometrics 108
  • Accounting 37
  • Education 58
Replace William P. Yohe with:
William P. Yohe United States
Michael Szenberg United States
Mark Skousen United States
Daniela Federici Italy
Pierre Sauvé Switzerland
John E. Silvia United States
Rómulo A. Chumacero Chile
James Washington Bell United States
Mohsin Khawaja Saudi Arabia
Herman Krooss United States
G. L. Bach relative to William P. Yohe United States William P. Yohe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
William P. Yohe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. L. Bach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. L. Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. L. Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. L. Bach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. L. Bach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. L. Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. L. Bach. The network helps show where G. L. Bach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside G. L. Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. L. Bach Line = papers co-authored together G. L. Bach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197470
2 195740
3
The Efficiency of Programmed Learning in Teaching Economics: The Results of a Nationwide Experiment
196930
4
Economics;: An introduction to analysis and policy
197121
5 197118
6 195817
7 197010
8
IMPROVING THE TEACHING OF ECONOMICS - ACHIEVEMENTS AND ASPIRATIONS
19848
9 19695
10 19745
11 19754
12
An Agenda for Improving the Teaching of Economics
19733
13 19523
14
Economics: Analysis Decision Making and Policy
19873
15
Microeconomics: A Programmed Book
19703
16 19523
17 19863
18 19782
19 19662
20 19722

About G. L. Bach

G. L. Bach is a scholar working on Education, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation and Infectious Diseases, having authored 31 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Educational Methods (6 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers), Education Systems and Policy (1 paper), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (1 paper), Economic Theory and Institutions (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper) and Economic theories and models (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (98 citations), Finance (48 citations), Economics and Econometrics (108 citations), Accounting (37 citations) and Education (58 citations). G. L. Bach has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Albert Ando, Keith G. Lumsden, Phillip Saunders, Allen C. Kelley, J. S. G. Wilson, Donald L. Kemmerer, C. D. Harbury, Paul W. McCracken, Alec Cairncross and Mary Jean Bowman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, The Journal of Economic Education, American Economic Review, The Review of Economics and Statistics and Economica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact