Keith D. Renshaw
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rebecca K. BlaisSarah B. CampbellHilary WeingardenCamila da Silva RodriguesCatherine M. CaskaDavid H. JonesAdam Bryant MillerChristianne Esposito‐Smythers
- Topics
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (50 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (37 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (29 papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Psychology ReviewPersonality and Individual DifferencesJournal of Affective Disorders
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Keith D. Renshaw
99 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Clinical Psychology 2.3k
- Social Psychology 838
- Sociology and Political Science 393
- General Health Professions 348
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 303
Countries citing papers authored by Keith D. Renshaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Keith D. Renshaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith D. Renshaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith D. Renshaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keith D. Renshaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith D. Renshaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith D. Renshaw. The network helps show where Keith D. Renshaw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith D. Renshaw
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith D. Renshaw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith D. Renshaw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith D. Renshaw. Keith D. Renshaw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 77 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Keith D. Renshaw
Keith D. Renshaw is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (50 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (37 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.3k citations), Social Psychology (838 citations) and Health (200 citations). Keith D. Renshaw has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca K. Blais, Sarah B. Campbell, Hilary Weingarden, Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Catherine M. Caska, David H. Jones, Adam Bryant Miller, Christianne Esposito‐Smythers, Dianne L. Chambless and Gail Steketee. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.