Rachel Lev‐Wiesel

3.7k total citations
145 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Rachel Lev‐Wiesel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Lev‐Wiesel has authored 145 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 108 papers in Clinical Psychology, 38 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 24 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Rachel Lev‐Wiesel's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (50 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (28 papers) and Art Therapy and Mental Health (22 papers). Rachel Lev‐Wiesel is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (50 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (28 papers) and Art Therapy and Mental Health (22 papers). Rachel Lev‐Wiesel collaborates with scholars based in Israel, Thailand and United States. Rachel Lev‐Wiesel's co-authors include Marianne Amir, Alean Al‐Krenawi, Shir Daphna‐Tekoah, Zvi Eisikovits, Ruth Gottfried, Dafna Tener, Batya Engel‐Yeger, Mordechai Hallak, Hadass Goldblatt and Hanna Admi and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Lev‐Wiesel

137 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Lev‐Wiesel Israel 28 1.7k 550 403 379 318 145 2.5k
Claude M. Chemtob United States 34 3.6k 2.1× 572 1.0× 767 1.9× 247 0.7× 513 1.6× 91 4.5k
Laura Nabors United States 26 1.3k 0.7× 429 0.8× 440 1.1× 89 0.2× 548 1.7× 177 2.8k
Tim Ayers United States 31 2.5k 1.5× 691 1.3× 488 1.2× 192 0.5× 723 2.3× 63 3.4k
Lenore C. Terr United States 22 3.3k 2.0× 559 1.0× 369 0.9× 238 0.6× 409 1.3× 56 4.1k
James N. Kirby Australia 26 2.5k 1.5× 415 0.8× 900 2.2× 164 0.4× 376 1.2× 101 3.4k
Rachel Dekel Israel 32 2.7k 1.6× 854 1.6× 703 1.7× 311 0.8× 654 2.1× 147 3.5k
Danya Glaser United Kingdom 22 2.6k 1.5× 637 1.2× 467 1.2× 447 1.2× 517 1.6× 64 3.1k
Fergal W. Jones United Kingdom 21 1.8k 1.0× 251 0.5× 547 1.4× 113 0.3× 397 1.2× 74 2.6k
Polly Waite United Kingdom 25 1.6k 1.0× 315 0.6× 501 1.2× 124 0.3× 302 0.9× 79 2.4k
Victoria E. Kress United States 21 1.5k 0.9× 230 0.4× 561 1.4× 243 0.6× 177 0.6× 72 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Lev‐Wiesel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Lev‐Wiesel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Lev‐Wiesel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Lev‐Wiesel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Lev‐Wiesel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Lev‐Wiesel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Lev‐Wiesel. The network helps show where Rachel Lev‐Wiesel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Lev‐Wiesel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Lev‐Wiesel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Lev‐Wiesel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Lev‐Wiesel. Rachel Lev‐Wiesel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel, et al.. (2024). Silenced Echoes: Revenge Fantasies Toward Unjust Events in Drawings and Narratives of Indian Hindu Women. Violence Against Women. 31(15-16). 4002–4025.
2.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel, et al.. (2024). Use of self-figure drawing as a screening tool to identify child sexual abuse, eating disorders, and suicidality. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 29(1).
4.
Goldner, Limor, et al.. (2021). Perceptions of Child Abuse as Manifested in Drawings and Narratives by Children and Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 562972–562972. 10 indexed citations
5.
Goldner, Limor, et al.. (2020). Can artificial intelligence achieve human-level performance? A pilot study of childhood sexual abuse detection in self-figure drawings. Child Abuse & Neglect. 109. 104755–104755. 17 indexed citations
6.
Goldner, Limor, et al.. (2019). Revenge Fantasies After Experiencing Traumatic Events: Sex Differences. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 886–886. 21 indexed citations
7.
Latzer, Yael, et al.. (2018). Relationship Between the Ideal Woman Model, Self-figure Drawing, and Disordered Eating among Jewish Ultra-Orthodox Women and National Religious Women.. PubMed. 55(1). 73–81. 6 indexed citations
8.
Eisikovits, Zvi, Dafna Tener, & Rachel Lev‐Wiesel. (2016). Adult women survivors of intrafamilial child sexual abuse and their current relationship with the abuser.. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 87(3). 216–225. 17 indexed citations
9.
Gottfried, Ruth, et al.. (2015). Inter-relationships between sexual abuse, female sexual function and childbirth. Midwifery. 31(11). 1087–1095. 14 indexed citations
10.
Klomek, Anat Brunstein, et al.. (2014). The relationship between self-injurious behavior and self-disclosure in adolescents with eating disorders. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity. 20(1). 43–48. 2 indexed citations
11.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel, et al.. (2014). Factors affecting disclosure among Israeli children in residential care due to domestic violence. Child Abuse & Neglect. 38(4). 618–626. 22 indexed citations
13.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel, et al.. (2014). The Role of Dissociation in Self-Injurious Behavior among Female Adolescents Who Were Sexually Abused. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 23(7). 824–839. 12 indexed citations
14.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel, et al.. (2013). Perception vs. Circumstances of the Child Sexual Abuse Event in Relation to Depression and Post-traumatic Stress Symptomatology. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 22(5). 519–533. 9 indexed citations
15.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel & Shir Daphna‐Tekoah. (2010). The Role of Peripartum Dissociation as a Predictor of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Following Childbirth in Israeli Jewish Women. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. 11(3). 266–283. 37 indexed citations
16.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel. (2006). Intergenerational Transmission of Sexual Abuse? Motherhood in the Shadow of Incest. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 15(2). 75–101. 22 indexed citations
17.
Amir, Marianne & Rachel Lev‐Wiesel. (2003). Time does not heal all wounds: Quality of life and psychological distress of people who survived the Holocaust as children 55 years later. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 16(3). 295–299. 72 indexed citations
18.
Amir, Marianne & Rachel Lev‐Wiesel. (2001). Does everyone have a name? Psychological distress and quality of life among child Holocaust survivors with lost identity. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 14(4). 859–869. 11 indexed citations
19.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel & Marianne Amir. (2001). SECONDARY TRAUMATIC STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS, SHARING OF TRAUMATIC REMINISCES, AND MARITAL QUALITY AMONG SPOUSES OF HOLOCAUST CHILD SURVIVORS. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 27(4). 433–444. 72 indexed citations
20.
Lev‐Wiesel, Rachel. (2000). RTE: revealing transference exercises in short-term group therapy. The Arts in Psychotherapy. 27(5). 339–344. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026