This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Abney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Abney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Abney more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Abney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Abney. The network helps show where Keith Abney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Abney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Abney.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Abney based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Abney. Keith Abney is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Abney, Keith, et al.. (2021). Big Brother Goes to School. Techné Research in Philosophy and Technology. 25(1). 162–183.1 indexed citations
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & Ryan Jenkins. (2017). Robot Ethics 2. 0: New Challenges in Philosophy, Law, and Society. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation).6 indexed citations
4.
Abney, Keith. (2017). Robots and Space Ethics. Oxford University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
5.
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & Ryan Jenkins. (2017). Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence.118 indexed citations
6.
Lin, Patrick, et al.. (2014). Super Soldiers: The Ethical, Legal and Operational Implications (Part 2). Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University).2 indexed citations
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). The Rights and Wrongs of Robot Care. 400.17 indexed citations
9.
Lin, Patrick K. F., Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). Robot Caregivers: Ethical Issues across the Human Lifespan. 400.17 indexed citations
10.
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). Contemporary Governance Architecture Regarding Robotics Technologies: An Assessment. 400.4 indexed citations
11.
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). Robots and Privacy. 400.1 indexed citations
12.
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). Robotics, Ethical Theory, and Metaethics: A Guide for the Perplexed. 400.24 indexed citations
13.
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). Robotic Warfare: Some Challenges in Moving from Noncivilian to Civilian Theaters. 400.18 indexed citations
14.
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). Killing Made Easy: From Joysticks to Politics. 400.18 indexed citations
15.
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). Current Trends in Robotics: Technology and Ethics. 400.25 indexed citations
16.
Lin, Patrick K. F., Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). The Inherent Dangers of Unidirectional Emotional Bonds between Humans and Social Robots. 400.98 indexed citations
17.
Lin, Patrick, Keith Abney, & George A. Bekey. (2012). Can Machines Be People? Reflections on the Turing Triage Test. 400.2 indexed citations
Abney, Keith. (2004). Sustainability, Morality and Future Rights. DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University). 2(2). 7.2 indexed citations
20.
Abney, Keith. (2003). Sports in Higher Education and "The Corporate University". DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University). 1(3). 5.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.