Katja Hölttä‐Otto

131 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Katja Hölttä‐Otto
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Mechanical Engineering 1.2k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 384
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 360
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 283
Replace Luciënne Blessing with:
Luciënne Blessing Singapore
Maria C. Yang United States
Andy Dong Australia
Gaetano Cascini Italy
Udo Lindemann Germany
Alex Duffy United Kingdom
Gerhard Pahl Germany
Joshua D. Summers United States
Saeema Ahmed‐Kristensen Denmark
James Moultrie United Kingdom
Katja Hölttä‐Otto relative to Luciënne Blessing Singapore Luciënne Blessing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Luciënne Blessing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katja Hölttä‐Otto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katja Hölttä‐Otto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katja Hölttä‐Otto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katja Hölttä‐Otto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katja Hölttä‐Otto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katja Hölttä‐Otto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katja Hölttä‐Otto. The network helps show where Katja Hölttä‐Otto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katja Hölttä‐Otto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katja Hölttä‐Otto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katja Hölttä‐Otto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katja Hölttä‐Otto. Katja Hölttä‐Otto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 24
5 2
6 2
7 14
8 14
9 29
10 17
11 4
12 21
13 6
14 31
15
The Effect of Prototyping and Critical Feedback on Fixation in Engineering Design.
24
16 7
17 15
18
Are Modular Products Larger Than Integral Products
3
19
Tradeoff between Modularity and Performance for Engineered Systems and Products
56
20
MODULARIZING PRODUCT ARCHITECTURES USING DENDROGRAMS
16

About Katja Hölttä‐Otto

Katja Hölttä‐Otto is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Human-Computer Interaction and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 137 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (84 papers), Product Development and Customization (48 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (1.0k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (360 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (1.2k citations). Katja Hölttä‐Otto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Otto, Carolyn Conner Seepersad, Olivier de Weck, Eun Suk Suh, Kristin L. Wood, Timothy W. Simpson, Trina C. Kershaw, Seung Ki Moon, Dieter Krause and Maria C. Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Reviews Materials, Frontiers in Psychology and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026