Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia Eckert
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Eckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Eckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Eckert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Eckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Eckert. The network helps show where Claudia Eckert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia Eckert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia Eckert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia Eckert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia Eckert. Claudia Eckert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Earl, Chris, et al.. (2012). Integrating physical and virtual testing to improve confidence in product design. Open Research Online (The Open University).1 indexed citations
5.
Moultrie, James, Andrew Wood, & Claudia Eckert. (2008). How do designers respond to changing social and cultural context in the styling of their products?. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
6.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (2008). Hierarchical decompositions for complex product representation. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.15 indexed citations
7.
Keller, René, Claudia Eckert, & P. John Clarkson. (2008). Through-life change prediction and management. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.3 indexed citations
8.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (2008). Indirect connections in a supply chain: Visualisation and analysis. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
9.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (2007). Component classification: a change perspective. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.4 indexed citations
10.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (2007). A unified framework for analysing decision-making in design: a multi-perspective approach. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.
11.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (2006). On the use of functions, behaviour and structural relations as cues for engineering change prediction. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.7 indexed citations
12.
Clarkson, P. John, et al.. (2006). Change impact analysis at the interface of system and embedded software design. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.2 indexed citations
13.
Clarkson, P. John & Claudia Eckert. (2005). Design process improvement. Open Research Online (The Open University).86 indexed citations
Lewis, Tim, Claudia Eckert, & P. John Clarkson. (2004). Product architecture issues within inclusive design. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
16.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (2003). MASS CUSTOMISATION, CHANGE AND INSPIRATION – CHANGING DESIGNS TO MEET NEW NEEDS. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.13 indexed citations
17.
Clarkson, P. John, et al.. (2002). Signposting: a generic framework for design process modelling. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.1 indexed citations
18.
Jarratt, T. A. W., et al.. (2002). Use of Monte Carlo methods in the prediction of change propagation. Open Research Online (The Open University).9 indexed citations
19.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (1999). An ethnographic methodology for design process analysis. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.12 indexed citations
20.
Eckert, Claudia, et al.. (1999). CAD system bias in engineering design. Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.