Kathy Sexton–Radek
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Andrew James HartleyStephen N. HaynesColleen M. WalshSarah E. HorseyJames Michael LampinenElizabeth CulnanCarolyn LemskyJacqueline D. Kloss
- Topics
- Sleep and related disorders (26 papers)Sleep and Wakefulness Research (18 papers)Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kathy Sexton–Radek
35 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 147
- Social Psychology 92
- Clinical Psychology 74
- Cognitive Neuroscience 70
- General Health Professions 41
Countries citing papers authored by Kathy Sexton–Radek
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathy Sexton–Radek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathy Sexton–Radek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathy Sexton–Radek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathy Sexton–Radek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathy Sexton–Radek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathy Sexton–Radek. The network helps show where Kathy Sexton–Radek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathy Sexton–Radek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathy Sexton–Radek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathy Sexton–Radek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathy Sexton–Radek. Kathy Sexton–Radek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 61 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | Academic Motivation in Middle School Children: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. | 1 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Kathy Sexton–Radek
Kathy Sexton–Radek is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (26 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (18 papers) and Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (30 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (147 citations) and Conservation (30 citations). Kathy Sexton–Radek has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew James Hartley, Stephen N. Haynes, Colleen M. Walsh, Sarah E. Horsey, James Michael Lampinen, Elizabeth Culnan, Carolyn Lemsky, Jacqueline D. Kloss, Jane M. Simoni and Robert Schleser. Their work appears in journals such as Sleep Medicine, Professional Psychology Research and Practice and Psychological Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.