Kathy Day

26 papers receiving 857 citations

Peers

Kathy Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Health Information Management 72
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • Molecular Biology 455
  • Family Practice 14
  • Drug Discovery 1
Replace Patricia Blanco with:
Patricia Blanco United Kingdom
Nigel Page United Kingdom
Efrat Dagan Israel
Ken Kato Japan
Kathleen M. Buckley United States
Fahad A. Bashiri Saudi Arabia
Phuong Bich Tran United States
Adam E. Locke United States
Timothy J. Bloom United States
Ashok Kumar Srivastava India
Kathy Day relative to Patricia Blanco United Kingdom Patricia Blanco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Patricia Blanco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathy Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathy Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathy Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathy Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathy Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathy Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathy Day. The network helps show where Kathy Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathy Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathy Day Line = papers co-authored together Kathy Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001195
2 2003134
3 201571
4 200752
5 200149
6 199145
7 199436
8 201734
9 199331
10 199131
11 201530
12 198929
13 202019
14 199418
15 199417
16 201615
17 199515
18 199412
19 20178
20 19988

About Kathy Day

Kathy Day is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physiology, Health Information Management and Genetics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), Connexins and lens biology (3 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (72 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations), Molecular Biology (455 citations), Family Practice (14 citations) and Drug Discovery (1 citation). Kathy Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian R. Duling, David N. Damon, Yaling Liao, Richard N. Day, Avi Parush, Lara Varpio, Daniel A. Goodenough, Alexander M. Simon, Xavier F. Figueroa and David L. Paul. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Biology, Medical Education, Molecular Endocrinology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and International Journal of Medical Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact