Kathleen Vancleef
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 16
- Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction 9
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 6
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 3
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 3
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
-
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 10
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management 3
- Co-authors
- Johan WagemansJenny C. A. ReadIgnacio Serrano‐PedrazaStephan P. SwinnenEls OrtibusNele DemeyereBart MachilsenLee de‐Wit
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)PLoS ONE (4 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumSpain
In The Last Decade
Kathleen Vancleef
32 papers receiving 474 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 344
- Ophthalmology 62
- Neurology 46
- Epidemiology 179
- Rehabilitation 34
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Vancleef
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Vancleef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Vancleef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Vancleef more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Vancleef
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Vancleef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Vancleef. The network helps show where Kathleen Vancleef may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathleen Vancleef, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 16 | Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST). | 2014 | 4 |
| 17 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 20 | Discrimination of locomotion direction in impoverished displays of walkers by macaque monkeys. | 2009 | 1 |
About Kathleen Vancleef
Kathleen Vancleef is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (10 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (9 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (344 citations), Ophthalmology (62 citations) and Neurology (46 citations). Kathleen Vancleef has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Johan Wagemans, Jenny C. A. Read, Ignacio Serrano‐Pedraza, Stephan P. Swinnen, Els Ortibus, Nele Demeyere, Bart Machilsen, Lee de‐Wit, Katrien Torfs and William N.P. Herbert. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.