Stéphanie Rossit

825 total citations
35 papers, 546 citations indexed

About

Stéphanie Rossit is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stéphanie Rossit has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 546 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Pharmacology and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stéphanie Rossit's work include Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (22 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (17 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers). Stéphanie Rossit is often cited by papers focused on Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (22 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (17 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers). Stéphanie Rossit collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Italy. Stéphanie Rossit's co-authors include Monika Harvey, Davinia Fernández‐Espejo, Adrian M. Owen, Fraser Smith, Melvyn A. Goodale, G. Duncan, Jody C. Culham, Paresh Malhotra, D. Adam McLean and Keith W. Muir and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Stéphanie Rossit

32 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stéphanie Rossit United Kingdom 14 436 89 86 74 44 35 546
L. Posteraro Italy 14 443 1.0× 39 0.4× 91 1.1× 43 0.6× 25 0.6× 27 551
Maria Levander Sweden 12 485 1.1× 33 0.4× 100 1.2× 25 0.3× 15 0.3× 21 575
Eve Greenfield United Kingdom 7 257 0.6× 85 1.0× 18 0.2× 33 0.4× 32 0.7× 9 428
Johannes Rennig United States 10 420 1.0× 38 0.4× 58 0.7× 38 0.5× 21 0.5× 31 516
Massimo Gentilini Italy 11 479 1.1× 264 3.0× 68 0.8× 18 0.2× 192 4.4× 16 772
Charlotte S. M. Schmidt Germany 10 273 0.6× 65 0.7× 12 0.1× 118 1.6× 29 0.7× 14 407
Bertrand Glize France 13 341 0.8× 112 1.3× 30 0.3× 12 0.2× 49 1.1× 33 615
C Barbieri Italy 6 408 0.9× 30 0.3× 61 0.7× 19 0.3× 30 0.7× 9 515
Ron Calvanio United States 8 410 0.9× 27 0.3× 43 0.5× 49 0.7× 57 1.3× 8 523
Antonia F. Ten Brink Netherlands 15 451 1.0× 43 0.5× 230 2.7× 21 0.3× 11 0.3× 55 584

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphanie Rossit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphanie Rossit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphanie Rossit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphanie Rossit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphanie Rossit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphanie Rossit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphanie Rossit. The network helps show where Stéphanie Rossit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stéphanie Rossit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stéphanie Rossit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stéphanie Rossit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stéphanie Rossit. Stéphanie Rossit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clark, Allan, et al.. (2024). Is there a lower visual field advantage for object affordances? A registered report. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 77(11). 2151–2164. 1 indexed citations
2.
Knights, Ethan, et al.. (2024). Peripheral and bimanual reaching in a stroke survivor with left visual neglect and extinction. Neuropsychologia. 201. 108901–108901.
3.
Smith, Fraser, et al.. (2023). Human see, human do? Viewing tool pictures evokes action-specific activity in visual hand-selective occipitotemporal cortex. Journal of Vision. 23(9). 4928–4928. 1 indexed citations
4.
Mitchell, A.G., et al.. (2022). Peripheral reaching in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Cortex. 149. 29–43. 5 indexed citations
5.
Knights, Ethan, Fraser Smith, & Stéphanie Rossit. (2022). The role of the anterior temporal cortex in action: evidence from fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis during real object grasping. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 9042–9042. 8 indexed citations
6.
Knights, Ethan, et al.. (2021). Hand-Selective Visual Regions Represent How to Grasp 3D Tools: Brain Decoding during Real Actions. Journal of Neuroscience. 41(24). 5263–5273. 21 indexed citations
7.
Mitchell, A.G., Robert D. McIntosh, Stéphanie Rossit, Michael Hornberger, & Suvankar Pal. (2020). Assessment of visually guided reaching in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study protocol. BMJ Open. 10(6). e035021–e035021. 3 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Fraser & Stéphanie Rossit. (2018). Identifying and detecting facial expressions of emotion in peripheral vision. PLoS ONE. 13(5). e0197160–e0197160. 40 indexed citations
9.
Thaler, Lore, Mark Daley, David W. Purcell, et al.. (2015). A selective impairment of perception of sound motion direction in peripheral space: A case study. Neuropsychologia. 80. 79–89. 9 indexed citations
10.
Rossit, Stéphanie, et al.. (2013). fMRI reveals a lower visual field preference for hand actions in human superior parieto-occipital cortex (SPOC) and precuneus. Cortex. 49(9). 2525–2541. 69 indexed citations
11.
Rossit, Stéphanie, et al.. (2011). fMRI reveals a lower visual field preference in dorsal visual stream regions during hand actions. Journal of Vision. 11(11). 952–952. 3 indexed citations
12.
Rossit, Stéphanie, et al.. (2011). The Role of Right Temporal Lobe Structures in Off-line Action: Evidence from Lesion-Behavior Mapping in Stroke Patients. Cerebral Cortex. 21(12). 2751–2761. 22 indexed citations
13.
Harvey, Monika & Stéphanie Rossit. (2011). Visuospatial neglect in action. Neuropsychologia. 50(6). 1018–1028. 35 indexed citations
14.
Rossit, Stéphanie, Paresh Malhotra, K.W. Muir, et al.. (2009). No Neglect-Specific Deficits in Reaching Tasks. Cerebral Cortex. 19(11). 2616–2624. 26 indexed citations
15.
Ludwig, Casimir J. H., Stephen H. Butler, Stéphanie Rossit, Monika Harvey, & Iain D. Gilchrist. (2009). Modelling contralesional movement slowing after unilateral brain damage. Neuroscience Letters. 452(1). 1–4. 2 indexed citations
16.
Rossit, Stéphanie, et al.. (2009). The neural basis of visuomotor deficits in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 47(10). 2149–2153. 22 indexed citations
17.
Butler, Stephen H., Stéphanie Rossit, Iain D. Gilchrist, et al.. (2009). Non-lateralised deficits in anti-saccade performance in patients with hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 47(12). 2488–2495. 13 indexed citations
18.
Rossit, Stéphanie, et al.. (2009). Memory-guided saccade processing in visual form agnosia (patient DF). Experimental Brain Research. 200(1). 109–116. 14 indexed citations
19.
Rossit, Stéphanie, et al.. (2008). Immediate and delayed reaching in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 47(6). 1563–1572. 21 indexed citations
20.
Rossit, Stéphanie & Monika Harvey. (2007). Age-related differences in corrected and inhibited pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research. 185(1). 1–10. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026