Kathleen M. Propp
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Julie ApkerWendy S. Zabava FordNancy M. WallaceGary L. KrepsDaniel Ν. NelsonRandy Y. Hirokawa
- Topics
- Team Dynamics and Performance (7 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers)Conflict Management and Negotiation (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kathleen M. Propp
14 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- General Health Professions 203
- Social Psychology 106
- Sociology and Political Science 97
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 75
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 60
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen M. Propp
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen M. Propp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen M. Propp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen M. Propp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen M. Propp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen M. Propp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen M. Propp. The network helps show where Kathleen M. Propp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen M. Propp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen M. Propp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen M. Propp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen M. Propp. Kathleen M. Propp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | |
| 2 | 82 | |
| 3 | Improving Outcomes of the Patient-Care Team: Investigating the Relationship between Nurse-Team Communication Processes and Team Performance | 1 |
| 4 | 119 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 121 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 14 |
About Kathleen M. Propp
Kathleen M. Propp is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Communication, having authored 14 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (7 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers) and Conflict Management and Negotiation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (47 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (18 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (44 citations). Kathleen M. Propp has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Julie Apker, Wendy S. Zabava Ford, Nancy M. Wallace, Gary L. Kreps, Daniel Ν. Nelson and Randy Y. Hirokawa. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Health Research, Human Communication Research and Health Communication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.