Kathleen E. Powers

520 citations
11 papers · 255 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Kathleen E. Powers

7 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers

Kathleen E. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Political Science and International Relations 124
  • Development 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 182
  • Communication 25
  • Social Psychology 47
Replace Stephen Benedict Dyson with:
Stephen Benedict Dyson United States
Hahm Chaibong South Korea
Andrew Oldenquist United States
Toni Erskine Australia
Amy King Australia
Jonathan W. Keller United States
Leigh K. Jenco United Kingdom
Evan Lewis
Omer Yair Israel
Carnes Lord United States
Kathleen E. Powers relative to Stephen Benedict Dyson United States Stephen Benedict Dyson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Stephen Benedict Dyson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen E. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen E. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen E. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen E. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen E. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen E. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen E. Powers. The network helps show where Kathleen E. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Kathleen E. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathleen E. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Kathleen E. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2014203
2 202214
3 201814
4 202112
5 20226
6 20214
7 20252
8 20220
9 20240
10 20220
11 20230

About Kathleen E. Powers

Kathleen E. Powers is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Media Influence and Politics (2 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and International Development and Aid (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (124 citations), Development (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (182 citations), Communication (25 citations) and Social Psychology (47 citations). Kathleen E. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian C. Rathbun, Joshua D. Kertzer, Ravi Iyer, Dan Altman, Stephen G. Brooks, Deborah Jordan Brooks, Jason Reifler, Thomas J. Scotto, Yusaku Horiuchi and Benjamin E. Goldsmith. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Conflict Resolution, International Studies Quarterly and Political Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact