Dan Altman

469 total citations
10 papers, 129 citations indexed

About

Dan Altman is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Dan Altman has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 129 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Dan Altman's work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (7 papers), Economic Sanctions and International Relations (3 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers). Dan Altman is often cited by papers focused on International Relations and Foreign Policy (7 papers), Economic Sanctions and International Relations (3 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers). Dan Altman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and United Kingdom. Dan Altman's co-authors include Kathleen E. Powers, Nicholas L. Miller, Melissa M. Lee, Kenji Shimada and Kai Quek and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Political Science, International Organization and International Studies Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Dan Altman

9 papers receiving 104 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dan Altman United States	7	80	58	22	16	12	10	129
Michael Penfold United States	6	62 0.8×	40 0.7×	18 0.8×	13 0.8×	5 0.4×	20	98
Jeffrey W. Hornung United States	8	125 1.6×	48 0.8×	24 1.1×	32 2.0×	17 1.4×	33	181
David H. Dunn United Kingdom	8	104 1.3×	83 1.4×	24 1.1×	7 0.4×	4 0.3×	32	172
Beth Grill United States	8	107 1.3×	111 1.9×	19 0.9×	16 1.0×	3 0.3×	31	181
Vladislav Belov Russia	7	81 1.0×	30 0.5×	25 1.1×	25 1.6×	9 0.8×	57	144
Bobo Lo United Kingdom	8	171 2.1×	85 1.5×	27 1.2×	11 0.7×	4 0.3×	15	214
Anne Daugherty Miles United Kingdom	3	112 1.4×	43 0.7×	30 1.4×	20 1.3×	3 0.3×	8	150
Seva Gunitsky Canada	7	106 1.3×	101 1.7×	14 0.6×	26 1.6×	7 0.6×	16	163
Fernando Bizzarro United States	4	100 1.3×	93 1.6×	15 0.7×	15 0.9×	11 0.9×	7	143
Michael Seeberg Denmark	5	83 1.0×	111 1.9×	7 0.3×	20 1.3×	7 0.6×	10	153

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Altman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Altman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Altman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Altman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Altman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Altman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Altman. The network helps show where Dan Altman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Altman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Altman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Altman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Altman. Dan Altman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Altman, Dan & Kai Quek. (2024). Do States Really Sink Costs to Signal Resolve?. Journal of Global Security Studies. 9(2).

2.

Powers, Kathleen E. & Dan Altman. (2022). The Psychology of Coercion Failure: How Reactance Explains Resistance to Threats. American Journal of Political Science. 67(1). 221–238. 14 indexed citations

3.

Altman, Dan & Melissa M. Lee. (2022). Why Territorial Disputes Escalate: The Causes of Conquest Attempts since 1945. International Studies Quarterly. 66(4). 4 indexed citations

4.

Altman, Dan. (2021). Red lines: Enforcement, declaration, and ambiguity in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Journal of Strategic Studies. 46(5). 977–1009. 2 indexed citations

5.

Altman, Dan. (2020). The Evolution of Territorial Conquest After 1945 and the Limits of the Territorial Integrity Norm. International Organization. 74(3). 490–522. 43 indexed citations

6.

Altman, Dan, et al.. (2018). A High-fidelity Tactile Hand Simulator as a Training Tool to Develop Competency in Percutaneous Pinning in Residents. JAAOS Global Research and Reviews. 2(7). e028–e028. 8 indexed citations

7.

Altman, Dan & Nicholas L. Miller. (2017). Red lines in nuclear nonproliferation. The Nonproliferation Review. 24(3-4). 315–342. 6 indexed citations

8.

Altman, Dan. (2017). Advancing without Attacking: The Strategic Game around the Use of Force. Security Studies. 27(1). 58–88. 20 indexed citations

9.

Altman, Dan. (2017). By Fait Accompli, Not Coercion: How States Wrest Territory from Their Adversaries. International Studies Quarterly. 61(4). 881–891. 26 indexed citations

10.

Altman, Dan. (2000). A Review of Experimentwise Type I Error: Implications for Univariate Post Hoc and for Multivariate Testing. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact