Mindi D. Foster

1.0k total citations
29 papers, 684 citations indexed

About

Mindi D. Foster is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mindi D. Foster has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 684 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 15 papers in Gender Studies and 13 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mindi D. Foster's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (9 papers). Mindi D. Foster is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (9 papers). Mindi D. Foster collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Mindi D. Foster's co-authors include Kimberly Matheson, Becky L. Choma, Richard Ruby, Hymie Anisman, Kenneth L. Dion, Robyn J. McQuaid, Amy Bombay, Carolyn L. Hafer, Faye J. Crosby and Lydia Jackson and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Mindi D. Foster

29 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mindi D. Foster Canada 17 467 240 230 137 56 29 684
Wendy J. Quinton United States 8 340 0.7× 152 0.6× 180 0.8× 76 0.6× 41 0.7× 14 487
Raquel Delevi United States 9 272 0.6× 281 1.2× 304 1.3× 273 2.0× 52 0.9× 11 685
Shardé M. Davis United States 15 319 0.7× 103 0.4× 316 1.4× 245 1.8× 42 0.8× 34 750
Nikhil K. Sengupta New Zealand 15 595 1.3× 82 0.3× 386 1.7× 98 0.7× 45 0.8× 28 770
Adam M. Galovan United States 16 526 1.1× 298 1.2× 373 1.6× 368 2.7× 31 0.6× 30 878
Renae Franiuk United States 11 289 0.6× 303 1.3× 206 0.9× 81 0.6× 26 0.5× 16 609
René Paulson United States 14 314 0.7× 121 0.5× 244 1.1× 194 1.4× 18 0.3× 26 734
Roderick L. Lilly United States 5 484 1.0× 103 0.4× 270 1.2× 167 1.2× 40 0.7× 9 732
Christine E. Rittenour United States 16 321 0.7× 90 0.4× 253 1.1× 141 1.0× 26 0.5× 35 586
Clare M. Mehta United States 12 237 0.5× 201 0.8× 236 1.0× 140 1.0× 11 0.2× 33 714

Countries citing papers authored by Mindi D. Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mindi D. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mindi D. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mindi D. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mindi D. Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mindi D. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mindi D. Foster. The network helps show where Mindi D. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mindi D. Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mindi D. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mindi D. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mindi D. Foster. Mindi D. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Matheson, Kimberly, et al.. (2021). Untangling racism: Stress reactions in response to variations of racism against Black Canadians. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 8(1). 7 indexed citations
2.
Foster, Mindi D., et al.. (2020). Tweeting about sexism motivates further activism: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology. 60(3). 741–764. 22 indexed citations
3.
Matheson, Kimberly, Mindi D. Foster, Amy Bombay, Robyn J. McQuaid, & Hymie Anisman. (2019). Traumatic Experiences, Perceived Discrimination, and Psychological Distress Among Members of Various Socially Marginalized Groups. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 416–416. 61 indexed citations
4.
Foster, Mindi D.. (2015). Tweeting about sexism: The well‐being benefits of a social media collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology. 54(4). 629–647. 48 indexed citations
6.
Choma, Becky L., Carolyn L. Hafer, Faye J. Crosby, & Mindi D. Foster. (2012). Perceptions of Personal Sex Discrimination: The Role of Belief in a Just World and Situational Ambiguity. The Journal of Social Psychology. 152(5). 568–585. 20 indexed citations
7.
Foster, Mindi D.. (2009). Perceiving Pervasive Discrimination Over Time: Implications for Coping. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 33(2). 172–182. 20 indexed citations
8.
Choma, Becky L., et al.. (2007). Use of Objectification Theory to Examine the Effects of a Media Literacy Intervention on Women. Sex Roles. 56(9-10). 581–590. 30 indexed citations
9.
Benazon, Nili R., Mindi D. Foster, & James C. Coyne. (2006). Expressed emotion, adaptation, and patient survival among couples coping with chronic heart failure.. Journal of Family Psychology. 20(2). 328–334. 10 indexed citations
10.
Foster, Mindi D., et al.. (2006). Responding to Discrimination as a Function of Meritocracy Beliefs and Personal Experiences: Testing the Model of Shattered Assumptions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 9(3). 401–411. 45 indexed citations
11.
Foster, Mindi D., et al.. (2005). The Effects of Meritocracy Beliefs on Women's Well-Being After First-Time Gender Discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 31(12). 1730–1738. 37 indexed citations
12.
Foster, Mindi D., et al.. (2004). When the Advantaged Become Disadvantaged: Men's and Women's Actions Against Gender Discrimination. Sex Roles. 50(1-2). 27–36. 11 indexed citations
13.
Foster, Mindi D. & Kenneth L. Dion. (2004). The Role of Hardiness in Moderating the Relationship Between Global/Specific Attributions and Actions Against Discrimination. Sex Roles. 51(3-4). 161–169. 8 indexed citations
14.
Foster, Mindi D.. (2001). The Motivational Quality of Global Attributions in Hypothetical and Experienced Situations of Gender Discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 25(3). 242–253. 22 indexed citations
15.
Matheson, Kimberly, et al.. (2000). Reactions to Affirmative Action: Seeking the Bases for Resistance1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 30(5). 1013–1038. 14 indexed citations
16.
Foster, Mindi D.. (2000). Positive and Negative Responses to Personal Discrimination: Does Coping Make a Difference?. The Journal of Social Psychology. 140(1). 93–106. 68 indexed citations
17.
Foster, Mindi D. & Kimberly Matheson. (1999). Perceiving and Responding to the Personal/Group Discrimination Discrepancy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 25(10). 1319–1329. 59 indexed citations
18.
Foster, Mindi D.. (1999). Acting Out Against Gender Discrimination: The Effects of Different Social Identities. Sex Roles. 40(3-4). 167–186. 25 indexed citations
19.
Foster, Mindi D. & Kimberly Matheson. (1998). Perceiving and Feeling Personal Discrimination: Motivation or Inhibition for Collective Action?. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 1(2). 165–174. 33 indexed citations
20.
Foster, Mindi D., et al.. (1994). Responding to Sexual Discrimination: The Effects of Societal versus Self-Blame. The Journal of Social Psychology. 134(6). 743–754. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026