Kate Misso

5.5k citations
52 papers · 4.1k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 26

Kate Misso

52 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Hit Papers

Cannabinoids for Medical Use1.5k20152026201820224008001.2k

Peers

Kate Misso
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Pharmacology 1.5k
  • Toxicology 171
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 187
  • Health 252
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 157
Replace Daphne Guh with:
Daphne Guh Canada
Karel Kostev Germany
Richard A. Hansen United States
Catherine H. MacLean United States
Andrew L. Avins United States
João Costa Portugal
Falk Hoffmann Germany
Tracy Dana United States
Philip C Hannaford United Kingdom
Yuhua Bao United States
Kate Misso relative to Daphne Guh Canada Daphne Guh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Daphne Guh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Misso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Misso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Misso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Misso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Misso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Misso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Misso. The network helps show where Kate Misso may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Misso, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Misso Line = papers co-authored together Kate Misso links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202327
2 202138
3 20212
4 202014
5 20208
6 20183
7 201764
8 20168
9
Cannabinoids for Medical Usebreakdown →
20151492
10 201466
11 2013178
12 201167
13 201122
14 200963
15 2008281
16 2006200
17 200690
18
Re: Hutton J, Brown R. Use of economic evaluation in decision-making: what needs to change? (Editorial) Value Health 2002;5:65-6.
2002101
19 200119
20
Fluoridation of Drinking Water: a systematic review of its efficacy and safety
20004

About Kate Misso

Kate Misso is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rheumatology and Family Practice, having authored 52 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers), Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (4 papers), Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (4 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.5k citations), Toxicology (171 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (187 citations). Kate Misso has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jos Kleijnen, Penny Whiting, Shona Lang, Steve Ryder, Robert Wolff, Adrían V. Hernández, Steven Duffy, Marcello Di Nisio, Sohan Deshpande and J. Christiaan Keurentjes. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, PharmacoEconomics, Current Medical Research and Opinion, Value in Health and Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026