Kate de Medeiros
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert L. RubinsteinAnne BastingAagje SwinnenPâmela SaundersFlorindo StellaConstantine G. LyketsosPatrick J. DoyleSerge Gauthier
- Topics
- Aging and Gerontology Research (18 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers)Identity, Memory, and Therapy (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe GerontologistThe Journals of Gerontology Series B
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Kate de Medeiros
55 papers receiving 888 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Psychiatry and Mental health 364
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 209
- Sociology and Political Science 207
- General Health Professions 205
- Social Psychology 134
Countries citing papers authored by Kate de Medeiros
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate de Medeiros's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate de Medeiros with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate de Medeiros more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate de Medeiros
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate de Medeiros. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate de Medeiros. The network helps show where Kate de Medeiros may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate de Medeiros
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate de Medeiros. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate de Medeiros based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate de Medeiros. Kate de Medeiros is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Narrative Gerontology: Countering the Master Narratives of Aging | 10 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 94 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 34 |
About Kate de Medeiros
Kate de Medeiros is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 61 papers that have together received 924 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (18 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers) and Identity, Memory, and Therapy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (209 citations), Conservation (101 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (364 citations). Kate de Medeiros has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Rubinstein, Anne Basting, Aagje Swinnen, Pâmela Saunders, Florindo Stella, Constantine G. Lyketsos, Patrick J. Doyle, Serge Gauthier, Antonis Politis and Andrea Brugnolo. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Gerontologist and The Journals of Gerontology Series B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.