Karen McNeil

20 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Karen McNeil
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Health Professions 322
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 201
  • Clinical Psychology 154
  • Emergency Medical Services 88
  • Sociology and Political Science 57
Replace Mary Chiarella with:
Mary Chiarella Australia
Mary Ellen Purkis Canada
Wendy McGuire Canada
Siegrid Deutschlander Canada
Janette Dill United States
Meg Bond United Kingdom
Lorelei Newton Canada
Mary Watkins United Kingdom
Pat Semeniuk Canada
Ian Seccombe United Kingdom
Karen McNeil relative to Mary Chiarella Australia Mary Chiarella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mary Chiarella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen McNeil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen McNeil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen McNeil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen McNeil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen McNeil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen McNeil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen McNeil. The network helps show where Karen McNeil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen McNeil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen McNeil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen McNeil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen McNeil. Karen McNeil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 8
2 0
3 5
4 110
5 87
6
Caring for people with dementia experiencing behavioural & psychological symptoms
1
7
People with dementia: A care guide for general practice
2
8 42
9 34
10 84
11 14
12
The role of the Clinical Supervisor (CS) in interprofessional pre-registration student clinical education – the unmet educational need in university wide health studies clinical practice – stage two
1
13 21
14 13
15 30
16 2
17 21
18 111
19
Academic work: a sessionalised future?
1
20
Institutional thickness and inter-organisational collaboration in clusters
1

About Karen McNeil

Karen McNeil is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Emergency Medical Services and General Health Professions, having authored 22 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (26 citations), General Health Professions (322 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (88 citations). Karen McNeil has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Mitchell, Vicki Parker, Anthony O’Brien, Brendan Boyle, Michelle Giles, Richard Fletcher, Nola M. Ries, Tony Smith, Amanda Dawson and Kim B. Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026