Karen E. Mock
- Ecology top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Genetics top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Barbara BentzKarin M. KettenringCarol A. RoweMichael E. PfrenderValerie D. HipkinsOlin E. RhodesJames N. LongRonald J. Ryel
- Topics
- Genetic diversity and population structure (34 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (20 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (20 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Karen E. Mock
96 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Ecology 1.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 851
- Genetics 559
- Global and Planetary Change 474
- Insect Science 421
Countries citing papers authored by Karen E. Mock
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen E. Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen E. Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen E. Mock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen E. Mock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen E. Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen E. Mock. The network helps show where Karen E. Mock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen E. Mock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen E. Mock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen E. Mock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen E. Mock. Karen E. Mock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 132 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 86 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 76 |
About Karen E. Mock
Karen E. Mock is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Insect Science, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (34 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (20 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (851 citations), Ecology (1.1k citations) and Insect Science (421 citations). Karen E. Mock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Bentz, Karin M. Kettenring, Carol A. Rowe, Michael E. Pfrender, Valerie D. Hipkins, Olin E. Rhodes, James N. Long, Ronald J. Ryel, Jer Pin Chong and Mark P. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.