William C. Pitt

2.3k total citations
69 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

William C. Pitt is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. Pitt has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Ecology, 20 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 16 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in William C. Pitt's work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (33 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (18 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers). William C. Pitt is often cited by papers focused on Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (33 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (18 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers). William C. Pitt collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. William C. Pitt's co-authors include Luís Fernando Pita Gondim, Milton Μ. McAllister, Karen H. Beard, Robert T. Sugihara, Gary W. Witmer, Aaron B. Shiels, Frederick F. Knowlton, Are R. Berentsen, Kathleen A. Fagerstone and John D. Eisemann and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Oecologia.

In The Last Decade

William C. Pitt

66 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William C. Pitt United States 22 808 563 302 291 288 69 1.7k
Sarah J. Burthe United Kingdom 27 1.0k 1.3× 475 0.8× 294 1.0× 387 1.3× 479 1.7× 64 2.1k
Gerardo Suzán Mexico 24 444 0.5× 413 0.7× 395 1.3× 321 1.1× 334 1.2× 114 2.1k
Isabella M. Cattadori United States 29 1.4k 1.7× 677 1.2× 209 0.7× 609 2.1× 433 1.5× 73 2.8k
Ryan J. Harrigan United States 28 937 1.2× 512 0.9× 162 0.5× 798 2.7× 423 1.5× 62 2.3k
Bethany J. Hoye Australia 21 1.0k 1.3× 214 0.4× 214 0.7× 174 0.6× 322 1.1× 39 1.9k
Brian F. Allan United States 24 456 0.6× 785 1.4× 174 0.6× 219 0.8× 423 1.5× 64 2.1k
Paulo Sérgio D’Andrea Brazil 30 872 1.1× 1.0k 1.9× 301 1.0× 307 1.1× 357 1.2× 121 2.9k
Dennis A. LaPointe United States 24 905 1.1× 1.2k 2.1× 115 0.4× 142 0.5× 555 1.9× 57 2.2k
Rebecca A. Bartel United States 10 583 0.7× 197 0.3× 81 0.3× 218 0.7× 330 1.1× 12 1.2k
Iván Castro-Arellano United States 20 457 0.6× 277 0.5× 140 0.5× 137 0.5× 480 1.7× 52 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Pitt. The network helps show where William C. Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Pitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Pitt. William C. Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kolby, Jonathan E., William C. Pitt, & Jamie K. Reaser. (2023). Domestication matters: risk analyses necessary to prevent zoonotic pathogen spillover from international wildlife trade are constrained by terminology. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 26(2). 95–117. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hill, Jacob E., Kelsey L. Turner, Joshua B. Smith, et al.. (2023). Scavenging dynamics on Guam and implications for invasive species management. Biological Invasions. 25(6). 1845–1858. 1 indexed citations
3.
Reaser, Jamie K., William C. Pitt, & Jonathan E. Kolby. (2023). Domestication matters: risk analyses necessary to prevent zoonotic pathogen spillover from international wildlife trade are constrained by terminology. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 26(1).
4.
Leopold, Devin R., David J. Flaspohler, Tadashi Fukami, et al.. (2021). Successful management of invasive rats across a fragmented landscape. Environmental Conservation. 48(3). 200–207. 5 indexed citations
5.
Klug, Page E., et al.. (2021). Locally abundant, endangered Mariana swiftlets impact the abundance, behavior, and body condition of an invasive predator. Oecologia. 195(4). 1083–1097. 12 indexed citations
6.
Siers, Shane R., John D. Eisemann, William C. Pitt, et al.. (2020). Automated Aerial Baiting for Invasive Brown Treesnake Control: System Overview and Program Status. Insecta mundi. 29(29). 2 indexed citations
7.
Pitt, William C., et al.. (2020). In vitro comparison of treatments and commercially available solutions on mortality of Angiostrongylus cantonensis third-stage larvae. Parasitology. 148(2). 212–220. 3 indexed citations
8.
Rankin, Erin E. Wilson, Jessie L. Knowlton, Daniel S. Gruner, et al.. (2018). Vertical foraging shifts in Hawaiian forest birds in response to invasive rat removal. PLoS ONE. 13(9). e0202869–e0202869. 8 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Joshua B., Kelsey L. Turner, James C. Beasley, et al.. (2016). Brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis) population density and carcass locations following exposure to acetaminophen. Ecotoxicology. 25(8). 1556–1562. 8 indexed citations
11.
Jarvi, Susan I., et al.. (2012). Quantitative PCR estimates Angiostrongylus cantonensis (rat lungworm) infection levels in semi-slugs (Parmarion martensi). Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 185(2). 174–176. 34 indexed citations
12.
Engeman, Richard M., William C. Pitt, Are R. Berentsen, & John D. Eisemann. (2012). Assessing spatial variation and overall density of aerially broadcast toxic bait during a rat eradication on Palmyra Atoll. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 20(1). 480–487. 7 indexed citations
13.
Mathies, Tom, et al.. (2012). Boiga Irregularis (Brown Treesnake). Insecta mundi. 1 indexed citations
14.
Pitt, William C., et al.. (2011). The effect of cooking on diphacinone residues related to human consumption of feral pig tissues. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 49(9). 2030–2034. 10 indexed citations
15.
Pitt, William C., et al.. (2010). Efficacy of Rodenticide Baits for the Control of Three Invasive Rodent Species in Hawaii. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 60(3). 533–542. 32 indexed citations
16.
Beard, Karen H., Cris Hagen, Eric M. O’Neill, et al.. (2007). Isolation of microsatellite loci from the coqui frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. Molecular Ecology Resources. 8(1). 139–141. 4 indexed citations
17.
Beard, Karen H. & William C. Pitt. (2005). Potential consequences of the coqui frog invasion in Hawaii. Diversity and Distributions. 11(5). 427–433. 59 indexed citations
18.
Gondim, Luís Fernando Pita, et al.. (2004). Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. International Journal for Parasitology. 34(2). 159–161. 458 indexed citations
19.
Pitt, William C.. (2001). SwarmFest 2000 : proceedings of the 4th annual Swarm user group meeting, March 11-13, 2000, Utah State University, Logan. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 8(1). 1. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026