Joseph C. Dysthe
- Ecology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- Kevin S. McKelveyMichael K. SchwartzMichael K. YoungThomas W. FranklinKellie J. CarimTorrey W. RodgersKaren E. MockDaniel H. Mason
- Topics
- Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (20 papers)Identification and Quantification in Food (15 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Joseph C. Dysthe
21 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Ecology 313
- Molecular Biology 223
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 108
- Ecological Modeling 72
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 14
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph C. Dysthe
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph C. Dysthe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph C. Dysthe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph C. Dysthe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph C. Dysthe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph C. Dysthe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph C. Dysthe. The network helps show where Joseph C. Dysthe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph C. Dysthe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph C. Dysthe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph C. Dysthe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph C. Dysthe. Joseph C. Dysthe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Testing environmental DNA from wolf snow tracks for species, sex, and individual identification | 6 |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 80 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 34 |
About Joseph C. Dysthe
Joseph C. Dysthe is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (20 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (15 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (72 citations), Ecology (313 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (108 citations). Joseph C. Dysthe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kevin S. McKelvey, Michael K. Schwartz, Michael K. Young, Thomas W. Franklin, Kellie J. Carim, Torrey W. Rodgers, Karen E. Mock, Daniel H. Mason, Kristine L. Pilgrim and Diana L. Six. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Conservation and Ecology and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.