Karen E Kearley

583 citations
11 papers · 448 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Karen E Kearley

11 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Karen E Kearley
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 148
  • Family Practice 8
  • General Health Professions 99
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
  • Physiology 82
Replace Lochan M. Shah with:
Lochan M. Shah United States
Jasmine Dhaliwal Canada
Pernille Lunde Norway
Petra G. van Peet Netherlands
Alaaeddin Alrohaibani United States
Carol Reynolds Geary United States
Ashton P Frulla United States
Dimos Mastrogiannis Greece
Astrid Seeberger Sweden
Helen E. Gomes United States
Karen E Kearley relative to Lochan M. Shah United States Lochan M. Shah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Lochan M. Shah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen E Kearley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen E Kearley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen E Kearley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen E Kearley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen E Kearley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen E Kearley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen E Kearley. The network helps show where Karen E Kearley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karen E Kearley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Karen E Kearley Line = papers co-authored together Karen E Kearley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1
Effectiveness of a nicotine patch in helping people stop smoking: Results of a randomised trial in general practice
1993100
2 201096
3 201496
4 201642
5 201433
6 201732
7
An evaluation of the hospital component of general practice vocational training.
199025
8 201310
9 20187
10 20074
11 20103

About Karen E Kearley

Karen E Kearley is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Dental Education, Practice, Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (148 citations), Family Practice (8 citations), General Health Professions (99 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations) and Physiology (82 citations). Karen E Kearley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carl J. Heneghan, Rafael Perera, Nia Wyn Roberts, David Mant, Richard F. Hobbs, David Andrew Fitzmaurice, Janet Harris, Matthew Thompson, Emma Meats and Daniel S Lasserson. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, BMJ Open, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, Medical Teacher and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact