Evidence-Based Medicine

591 papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 591 papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine usually cover General Health Professions (124 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (83 papers) specifically the topics of Health Sciences Research and Education (62 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (47 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evidence-Based Medicine are M. Hassan Murad, Mouaz Alsawas, Fares Alahdab, Noor Asi, R. Brian Haynes, Zhen Wang, Gordon Guyatt, Rod Jackson, Reem A. Mustafa and Shahnaz Sultan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Evidence-Based Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evidence-Based Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evidence-Based Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-Based Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025