Kamala London

2.7k total citations
49 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Kamala London is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kamala London has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Clinical Psychology and 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kamala London's work include Memory Processes and Influences (18 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (11 papers). Kamala London is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (18 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (11 papers). Kamala London collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Kamala London's co-authors include Maggie Bruck, Daniel B. Wright, Stephen J. Ceci, Daniel W. Shuman, Isabelle D. Cherney, Andy P. Field, Karen Bartsch, Narina Nuñez, Rebecca Landa and Michael Waechter and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Developmental Psychology and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Kamala London

44 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kamala London United States 18 772 520 445 317 314 49 1.7k
M. Meghan Davidson United States 23 501 0.6× 338 0.7× 405 0.9× 340 1.1× 400 1.3× 50 1.6k
Karen J. Saywitz United States 26 1.1k 1.4× 976 1.9× 704 1.6× 488 1.5× 392 1.2× 49 2.0k
Thomas D. Lyon United States 28 1.4k 1.9× 1.0k 2.0× 1.0k 2.3× 522 1.6× 462 1.5× 163 2.5k
Robin S. Edelstein United States 31 1.5k 1.9× 615 1.2× 1.4k 3.2× 358 1.1× 660 2.1× 65 2.9k
Paul Kwon United States 21 716 0.9× 305 0.6× 987 2.2× 201 0.6× 323 1.0× 44 1.9k
Morton J. Mendelson Canada 20 1.1k 1.5× 392 0.8× 699 1.6× 308 1.0× 505 1.6× 54 2.5k
Paula J. Caplan Canada 19 504 0.7× 211 0.4× 298 0.7× 195 0.6× 262 0.8× 63 1.6k
Giulio Cesare Zavattini Italy 21 1.2k 1.5× 265 0.5× 893 2.0× 215 0.7× 364 1.2× 91 2.1k
Rosalyn H. Shute Australia 25 798 1.0× 155 0.3× 874 2.0× 408 1.3× 397 1.3× 75 2.1k
A. Chris Downs United States 19 580 0.8× 284 0.5× 330 0.7× 244 0.8× 276 0.9× 63 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Kamala London

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kamala London's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kamala London with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kamala London more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kamala London

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kamala London. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kamala London. The network helps show where Kamala London may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kamala London

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kamala London. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kamala London based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kamala London. Kamala London is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lawson, Monica, et al.. (2025). Maternal elaboration and children’s episodic memory accuracy: A double-edged sword?. Developmental Psychology. 61(4). 726–738.
2.
London, Kamala, et al.. (2024). Children's Responses to “Do You Remember …” Questions About Their Memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 38(6).
3.
London, Kamala, et al.. (2021). Laypeople’s Knowledge and Misconceptions of Sex Trafficking Influenced by Training Formats. Journal of Human Trafficking. 9(1). 94–118. 3 indexed citations
4.
London, Kamala, et al.. (2021). Mock jurors’ perceptions of child sexual abuse cases involving sexual and gender minority victims.. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. 10(2). 311–323. 1 indexed citations
5.
London, Kamala, et al.. (2019). A retrospective approach to examining child abuse disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect. 99. 104263–104263. 36 indexed citations
6.
London, Kamala, et al.. (2018). Scholarly Track Training in Emergency Medicine Residencies in 2017. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 19.
7.
London, Kamala, et al.. (2017). Does it help, hurt, or something else? The effect of a something else response alternative on children’s performance on forced-choice questions.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 23(3). 281–289. 3 indexed citations
8.
Lawson, Monica & Kamala London. (2017). Children's memory for conversations after a 1-year delay.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 6(3). 328–336. 7 indexed citations
9.
Zajac, Rachel, Maryanne Garry, Kamala London, Felicity Goodyear‐Smith, & Harlene Hayne. (2013). Misconceptions about childhood sexual abuse and child witnesses: Implications for psychological experts in the courtroom. Memory. 21(5). 608–617. 20 indexed citations
10.
London, Kamala, Maggie Bruck, Debra Ann Poole, & Laura Melnyk. (2010). The development of metasuggestibility in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 25(1). 146–155. 8 indexed citations
11.
Wright, Daniel B. & Kamala London. (2009). Modern Regression Techniques Using R: A Practical Guide for Students and Researchers. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 12 indexed citations
12.
Wright, Daniel B., Fiona Gabbert, Amina Memon, & Kamala London. (2008). Changing the criterion for memory conformity in free recall and recognition. Memory. 16(2). 137–148. 41 indexed citations
13.
Wright, Daniel B. & Kamala London. (2008). Multilevel modelling: Beyond the basic applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 62(2). 439–456. 51 indexed citations
14.
London, Kamala, Maggie Bruck, & Laura Melnyk. (2008). Post-event information affects children’s autobiographical memory after one year.. Law and Human Behavior. 33(4). 344–355. 28 indexed citations
15.
Bartsch, Karen, et al.. (2007). Children's attention to beliefs in interactive persuasion tasks.. Developmental Psychology. 43(1). 111–120. 32 indexed citations
16.
Bruck, Maggie, et al.. (2007). Autobiographical memory and suggestibility in children with autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology. 19(1). 73–95. 112 indexed citations
17.
London, Kamala, Maggie Bruck, Daniel B. Wright, & Stephen J. Ceci. (2007). Review of the contemporary literature on how children report sexual abuse to others: Findings, methodological issues, and implications for forensic interviewers. Memory. 16(1). 29–47. 206 indexed citations
18.
Vasa, Roma A., et al.. (2006). Valence ratings of emotional and non-emotional words in children. Personality and Individual Differences. 41(6). 1169–1180. 26 indexed citations
19.
London, Kamala. (2001). Investigative Interviews of Children: A Review of Psychological Research and Implications for Police Practices. Police Quarterly. 4(1). 123–144. 10 indexed citations
20.
London, Kamala, et al.. (2000). Children's use of mental state information in selecting persuasive arguments.. Developmental Psychology. 36(3). 352–365. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026