Daniel W. Shuman

2.6k total citations
70 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Daniel W. Shuman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel W. Shuman has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Clinical Psychology, 18 papers in Social Psychology and 14 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Daniel W. Shuman's work include Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (11 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (10 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers). Daniel W. Shuman is often cited by papers focused on Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (11 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (10 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers). Daniel W. Shuman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Daniel W. Shuman's co-authors include Stuart A. Greenberg, Kamala London, Maggie Bruck, Stephen J. Ceci, Richard Rogers, Bruce D. Sales, Lisa L. Hazelwood, Kenneth W. Sewell, Kimberly S. Harrison and Robert Simon and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Cognitive Psychology, Law and Human Behavior and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Daniel W. Shuman

65 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel W. Shuman United States	20	1.0k	533	374	225	195	70	1.5k
Ronald Roesch Canada	26	1.6k 1.5×	596 1.1×	699 1.9×	293 1.3×	113 0.6×	110	2.2k
Randy K. Otto United States	23	1.3k 1.2×	345 0.6×	704 1.9×	153 0.7×	70 0.4×	65	1.8k
Jodi L. Viljoen Canada	24	1.4k 1.4×	383 0.7×	975 2.6×	226 1.0×	107 0.5×	82	1.9k
Jacinthe Dion Canada	20	892 0.9×	269 0.5×	289 0.8×	182 0.8×	86 0.4×	95	1.3k
Ralph Slovenko United States	14	587 0.6×	294 0.6×	329 0.9×	157 0.7×	69 0.4×	146	1.1k
David DeMatteo United States	23	1.1k 1.1×	264 0.5×	805 2.2×	162 0.7×	79 0.4×	101	1.6k
Theodore P. Cross United States	26	1.6k 1.6×	266 0.5×	613 1.6×	474 2.1×	109 0.6×	77	2.0k
Elissa P. Benedek United States	20	680 0.7×	175 0.3×	468 1.3×	146 0.6×	62 0.3×	98	1.2k
Fred Seymour New Zealand	18	516 0.5×	193 0.4×	283 0.8×	167 0.7×	94 0.5×	48	913
Matthew T. Huss United States	21	633 0.6×	192 0.4×	506 1.4×	86 0.4×	44 0.2×	55	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Shuman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Shuman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Shuman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Shuman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Shuman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Shuman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Shuman. The network helps show where Daniel W. Shuman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel W. Shuman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel W. Shuman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel W. Shuman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel W. Shuman. Daniel W. Shuman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Shuman, Daniel W., et al.. (2010). Empathy or objectivity: The forensic examiner's dilemma?. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 28(5). 585–602. 14 indexed citations

Shuman, Daniel W. & Liza H. Gold. (2008). Without Thinking: Impulsive Aggression and Criminal Responsibility. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 26(6). 723–734. 4 indexed citations

Rogers, Richard, et al.. (2008). Spanish translations of Miranda warnings and the totality of the circumstances.. Law and Human Behavior. 33(1). 61–69. 13 indexed citations

Rogers, Richard, Lisa L. Hazelwood, Kenneth W. Sewell, Kimberly S. Harrison, & Daniel W. Shuman. (2007). The language of Miranda warnings in American jurisdictions: A replication and vocabulary analysis.. Law and Human Behavior. 32(2). 124–136. 60 indexed citations

Simon, Robert & Daniel W. Shuman. (2006). The Standard of Care in Suicide Risk Assessment:An Elusive Concept. CNS Spectrums. 11(6). 442–445. 11 indexed citations

Shuman, Daniel W., et al.. (2006). Consent, disclosure, and waiver for the forensic psychological evaluation: Rethinking the roles of psychologist and lawyer.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 37(5). 437–445. 9 indexed citations

Rogers, Richard, Kimberly S. Harrison, Daniel W. Shuman, Kenneth W. Sewell, & Lisa L. Hazelwood. (2006). An analysis of Miranda warnings and waivers: Comprehension and coverage.. Law and Human Behavior. 31(2). 177–192. 82 indexed citations

Simon, Robert, James L. Levenson, & Daniel W. Shuman. (2005). On sound and unsound mind: the role of suicide in tort and insurance litigation.. PubMed. 33(2). 176–82. 3 indexed citations

Jackson, Rebecca L., Richard Rogers, & Daniel W. Shuman. (2004). The Adequacy and Accuracy of Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Contextualized Risk Assessment in Clinical Practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 3(2). 115–129. 22 indexed citations

10.

Greenberg, Stuart A., Daniel W. Shuman, & Robert G. Meyer. (2004). Unmasking forensic diagnosis. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 27(1). 1–15. 21 indexed citations

11.

Shuman, Daniel W.. (2003). TROXEL v. GRANVILLE AND THE BOUNDARIES OF THERAPEUTIC JURISPRUDENCE. Family Court Review. 41(1). 67–76. 1 indexed citations

12.

Shuman, Daniel W., et al.. (2001). Are court-appointed experts the solution to the problems of expert testimony?. Insecta mundi. 84(4). 5 indexed citations

13.

Shuman, Daniel W.. (2001). Expertise in Law, Medicine, and Health Care. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law. 26(2). 267–290. 8 indexed citations

14.

Shuman, Daniel W., et al.. (2000). Getting it right: the trial of sexual assault and child molestation cases under federal rules of evidence 413-415. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 18(2-3). 169–216. 1 indexed citations

15.

Shuman, Daniel W.. (1997). The Standard of Care in Medical Malpractice Claims, Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Managed Care: Towards a Therapeutic Harmony?. California western law review. 34(1). 9. 6 indexed citations

16.

Sales, Bruce D., et al.. (1997). Doing Legal Research. 1 indexed citations

17.

Shuman, Daniel W. & Myron Weiner. (1987). The psychotherapist-patient privilege : a critical examination. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 4 indexed citations

18.

Shuman, Daniel W.. (1985). The origins of the physician-patient privilege and professional secret.. PubMed. 39(2). 661–87. 11 indexed citations

19.

Weiner, Myron & Daniel W. Shuman. (1984). Privilege—a Comparative Study. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law. 12(3). 373–383. 1 indexed citations

20.

Shuman, Daniel W.. (1979). Road to Bedlam: Evidentiary Guideposts in Civil Commitment Proceedings. The Notre Dame law review. 55(1). 53. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact