Kaitlynn Mendes
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 30
- Gender Politics and Representation 9
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies 5
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 4
- Gender, Security, and Conflict 3
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics 13
- Media Studies and Communication 10
- Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
-
- Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection 5
- Co-authors
- Jessica RingroseJessalynn KellerCynthia CarterAnabel Quan‐HaaseTanya HoreckBetsy MilneSonia Núñez PuenteRachel Loney-Howes
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Computers in Human Behavior (1 paper)Sex Roles (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kaitlynn Mendes
38 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Gender Studies 963
- Communication 493
- Sociology and Political Science 480
- Health 85
- Clinical Psychology 135
Countries citing papers authored by Kaitlynn Mendes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kaitlynn Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kaitlynn Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaitlynn Mendes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kaitlynn Mendes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kaitlynn Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kaitlynn Mendes. The network helps show where Kaitlynn Mendes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Kaitlynn Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 1 |
About Kaitlynn Mendes
Kaitlynn Mendes is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Communication and Museology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (30 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers), Media Studies and Communication (10 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (9 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (963 citations), Communication (493 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (480 citations). Kaitlynn Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jessica Ringrose, Jessalynn Keller, Cynthia Carter, Anabel Quan‐Haase, Tanya Horeck, Betsy Milne, Sonia Núñez Puente, Rachel Loney-Howes, Bianca Fileborn and Debbie Ging. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers in Human Behavior and Sex Roles.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.