Kaiqi Zhou

17 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Kaiqi Zhou
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 142
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 51
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 93
  • Safety Research 23
  • Occupational Therapy 10
Replace Sajjad Hussain with:
Sajjad Hussain Pakistan
Hongwu Zhu China
Yonggang Cheng China
Jingwei Gao China
Xingrong Liu China
Mengfei Qu China
Xueliang Jiang China
Yongxin Wu China
Huan Cai China
Zizhao Zhang China
Kaiqi Zhou relative to Sajjad Hussain Pakistan Sajjad Hussain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Sajjad Hussain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kaiqi Zhou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kaiqi Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kaiqi Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaiqi Zhou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kaiqi Zhou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kaiqi Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kaiqi Zhou. The network helps show where Kaiqi Zhou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kaiqi Zhou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kaiqi Zhou Line = papers co-authored together Kaiqi Zhou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016172
2 202437
3 201826
4 202212
5 202211
6 20235
7 20243
8 20242
9 20252
10 20232
11 20252
12 20172
13 20181
14 20171
15 20171
16 20231
17 20241
18 20181
19 20230
20 20250

About Kaiqi Zhou

Kaiqi Zhou is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology, Hardware and Architecture, Demography and Occupational Therapy, having authored 25 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Education and Employment (8 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (5 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (3 papers) and Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (142 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (51 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (93 citations), Safety Research (23 citations) and Occupational Therapy (10 citations). Kaiqi Zhou has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Chaojun Ouyang, Qiang Xu, Dongpo Wang, Weile Li, Dalei Peng, Jian‐Hua Yin, Linhui Zhou, Qin Wu, Xinyi Wang and Malachy Bishop. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, Journal of Employment Counseling and Parkinsonism & Related Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact